|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 45 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I really don't know what to say about this image but your crop is good. Had I been doing this, I wold have superimposed several shots of the flowers, moving the camera bit between exposures, to produce what might be an interesting abstract. |
Feb 14th |
| 45 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
My initial thought would be to try a softer focus. Might this fit better with the flow of the dance motion? |
Feb 14th |
| 45 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I wonder if working with the original frame would yield a more interesting image. I vote for natural light, too. The background is effective, as seen in the original. |
Feb 14th |
| 45 |
Feb 18 |
Reply |
A lower perspective is an interesting thought but at age 81, almost, I don't bend that easily anymore. Also, I don't have a tilt screen! |
Feb 14th |
| 45 |
Feb 18 |
Reply |
My intention was for the color to be more sepia. |
Feb 14th |
| 45 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I made an error when I submitted this image - I used the wrong title. The title should have been "Track and Shadow", based on the ski track and the irregular shadow, to the right of the tracks that is cast by the jagged raised edge of ice. |
Feb 2nd |
| 45 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I would have expected the deeper parts of the flower to be in focus with the stacking technique. There is a mark (reflection?) just to the right of center. Couldn't that have been taken out easily in editing? What about going in closer and filling the frame with the delicate color of the petals? |
Feb 1st |
| 45 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
The building still looks like it is falling over. Had I been taking this picture, I would have zoomed in much further filling the frame with building detail and window reflections. I wonder if this might have produced an interesting abstract. |
Feb 1st |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 45
|
6 comments - 2 replies Total
|