|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 45 |
Jan 18 |
Comment |
I agree with the cropping. An interesting idea here and I wonder where it might lead. |
Jan 9th |
| 45 |
Jan 18 |
Comment |
There really are two pictures here, one of the boats and the other the silhouette of the buildings. They do not complement one another. I don't know where to go with the image. |
Jan 9th |
| 45 |
Jan 18 |
Comment |
A classic photo! How about getting the bird out of the center and what about a tighter crop top and bottom, to a rectangular format, to add to the sense of motion? |
Jan 9th |
| 45 |
Jan 18 |
Comment |
I agree with Cindy's and Don's comments. Something bothers me about the image - is it too contrasty or has it been oversharpened? Might it be improved by being a bit softer? |
Jan 9th |
| 45 |
Jan 18 |
Comment |
The lights on the tree trunks make the image unusual. At first glance, I thought this was some variation on fireworks. In the absence of a tripod, did you increase the ISO? I would have used max ISO. In my case with a D7100, I would have used 6400. |
Jan 4th |
| 45 |
Jan 18 |
Comment |
A perfect picture of a swan. Did you get ride of some of the reflections in processing? Looks like you might have. If so, I would restore all of the reflections in the original. The orange bill adds a lot to the image. |
Jan 4th |
| 45 |
Jan 18 |
Reply |
Replying to both Cindy and Don: I suppose I could have cropped in closer but I do like bokeh - I am in my bokeh phase! |
Jan 4th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 45
|
6 comments - 1 reply Total
|