|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 93 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
This seems like such a lovely flower to be placed on the "hit list". I agree with Michael...great focus on the foreground element, and good contrast with the green stems. Remind me , again, why you are drawn to high ISO settings! |
Jun 17th |
| 93 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Jerry, " you have done us (Group 93) proud." Where did you take the portrait? |
Jun 17th |
| 93 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Jerry,
Your "motion" has turned a landscape into an Abstract; and a good one. Your concern for DOF has paid off. My eye is first drawn to the closest tree, the one more affected by the train motion. Then to the distance, where every tree is still in focus. Take a stroll over to Group 96, Dan Mottaz' image. He has an explanation that applies to your image. Good work! |
Jun 17th |
| 93 |
Jun 21 |
Comment |
Michael,
I enjoy your use of NIK and Topaz. I have both but cannot do with them what you are doing. You challenge me to experiment. This image is good...but made better by your texture...and made better yet (forgive me) if the Concrete Chalk had been applied only to the butterfly. Thanks for your tutelage. |
Jun 17th |
| 93 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
The sun was almost directly above. The camera was pointed at a dark grey fence...
you may see light coming through the slats. |
Jun 17th |
| 93 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
Jerry, I will be very interested in seeing your "New Summer Gallery" from the Botanical garden. |
Jun 10th |
| 93 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
Ed, I captured this, and several other images, by getting on my knees and sticking the Leica under the flowers. I found my neighbors giving me a strange look. This trick seemed to work best with a Macro lens or a 10mm wide angle. Thanks for your comments. |
Jun 10th |
| 93 |
Jun 21 |
Reply |
To Jerry and Ed, many thanks for your kind comments |
Jun 10th |
4 comments - 4 replies for Group 93
|
4 comments - 4 replies Total
|