|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 88 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
Very nice image and excellent post production!! Watercolorist can't do better than you did!!
|
Mar 2nd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 88
|
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Reply |
Lucky you living so close to so many great national parks!! Endless opportunities to take great photos!! |
Mar 9th |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Reply |
Good point about the boldness of the foreground feature and thanks for your modified version! |
Mar 9th |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for you comment!! |
Mar 4th |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for you comment!! |
Mar 4th |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for your comment. |
Mar 4th |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
I am not an expert in B/W photography but I think you did a good job on this image. Very clear and very good dark/white and gray tones. The only comment I have is the cropping. If your original had the whole cactus captured, I would not crop both left and right edges. |
Mar 3rd |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
Beautiful image. I know it is a challenge to take photo of rainbow with waterfall in the background, and the light source angle in this image. However, I kind of agreed with Paul. My personal preference would reduce exposure at the bottom part. |
Mar 2nd |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
Agreed with everything said here. I am wondering if you changed your DOF and blur out background from far end of pilings may make the picture a different look. To me, the less is more. :-) |
Mar 2nd |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
I agreed with Paul's comment. I made some changes and cropped your image to reduce reflection of the water only leaving the reflection of the mountain. I think the big area of 'white' is overpowering and unnecessary. This is my personal preference; others may have different point of view. |
Mar 2nd |
 |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
Same comment as Paul. What a beautiful image!! I love it!! |
Mar 2nd |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Comment |
Nice composed and beautiful image! I noticed the green blur in the bottom right corner, as you mentioned. I'm not sure if that is the original look or after your post production, some cloud patches look a little bit surreal. This is just my personal opinion. |
Mar 2nd |
| 93 |
Mar 20 |
Reply |
This photo was taken early morning and the ground moisture evaporating that caused the haze. I used adjustment layer/mask to boost up rocks' contrast and saturation but didn't 'see' the haze while doing it. Thank you for your comment and your sharpened version. I'll look up PS equivalent technique to remove haze. |
Mar 2nd |
6 comments - 6 replies for Group 93
|
7 comments - 6 replies Total
|
