|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 73 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
The funny part was initially they were more like distractions in my frame, so I was waiting for them to leave. But suddenly they turned the other way, I thought that made a good moment to capture.
I totally agree with the sunrise/sunset comment. Absolutely worth visiting if living in that area.
Thanks for the feedback. |
Jun 13th |
| 73 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Nice shot. Great attempt to do slow shutter during the harsh light. I, however, am not sure where to focus - the building on the left and the bridge on the right - both seek attention. |
Jun 13th |
| 73 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Beautiful elements going here. Skies, clouds, hills in the background, waterbody, roads leading lines, cars with their lights. I am amazed how you were able to get starlight from the oncoming car at f/4.5.
Stunning postcard image. Loved it. |
Jun 13th |
| 73 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Postcard indeed. Beautiful frame. Lines nicely flow to the valley in the background. Nice clouds and skies. Was this under morning or evening golden sun ? or was the saturation a bit higher? |
Jun 13th |
3 comments - 1 reply for Group 73
|
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Beautiful image. I love it - very little noise for a 3200 ISO.
Only curious question about the settings. Any particular reason for F/18? You could have gone a couple of stops faster on aperture (f/8 or f/9)and then gained with SS or lower ISO. |
Jun 18th |
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Thanks, great stuff. |
Jun 14th |
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Nice colors and contrasts. The curve line dictates the frame I feel and clearly marks out the yellow sand and coal. Mines are human interference but landscapes are nature-based. I feel if there were trucks or mining vehicles, this image may not have qualified as a nature-based shot.
Nice drone shot. |
Jun 13th |
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
This is nature plus category so lot more flexibility than Nature. For me, this definitely falls in the nature plus category, even nature. Man-made objects are fine, as long as they are not the focus of the image or key element of the frame.
I loved the shot. Very elegant frame - I feel it is cropped just right and in the line of where the eyes go. ISO is at 3200, but the image shows no signs of noise. Great job at that.
Curious question - Was flash used ? A small light dot on the eye suggests that but could be a reflection too. |
Jun 13th |
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Loved the image. The egret's eyes are nice and sharp, and so are the white feathers.
The background has contrasting shades above and below the bird - I loved that. The frame is well captured.
Surprised, however, by how sharp the background is, given the bird is closer(I think) to the lens and it is shot at f/5.6. I would have expected clouds to be dark/greyish but less sharp.
Great one Marina! |
Jun 13th |
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Like the colors and their contrasts. Cute frame overall. Represents the butterfly and the flower very well. |
Jun 13th |
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Thanks, Michelle. I wanted the web and droplets in them to stand out as much as I could. Thanks for the feedback on the crop. See the above-re-edited image. |
Jun 13th |
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
This is the re-edit of the same image. The closeup I am referring to is a different image. |
Jun 13th |
| 89 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Thanks Marina for your feedback. I do have another image with the left side part with more closeup. This one was an attempt to capture the full webbing epicenter and droplets around it. I have tried a different edit - based on what I want to show and your and Michelle's feedback. Let me know if it slightly improves.
ISO was already at 1600. Maybe under better lighting, I can try 1/200 and f/18. |
Jun 13th |
 |
4 comments - 5 replies for Group 89
|
7 comments - 6 replies Total
|
