|
Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
11 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Good job going back into your old images and reworking them, something I should do more often. I agree with Allen, your conversion turned a so=so image into a dramatic image that I want to linger on. Your color version reminds me of my own early HDR phase, something I shudder to remember... |
Jun 10th |
11 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
While the color version is compelling in its own right, the monochrome version has a more dramatic, storytelling aspect to it. Lots to look at, but I'm particularly drawn to the two ships on the right side. The way they seem to almost melt into the ocean adds to the drama. |
Jun 10th |
11 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
I love shadowplay on walls like this and I can see why you were drawn to it. I really like your composition which gives the wall an almost menacing power. It should print really well. One very minor suggestion would be to crop in slightly from the left edge to eliminate that little bit of wall in the lower-left corner. I find it distracting. |
Jun 10th |
11 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
It's always fun to sneak a photo and you did a great job here. My first thought when I saw this was that it was some sort of plant until I took a closer look. Despite the circumstances, you composed this beautifully and your black and white processing is spot on. |
Jun 10th |
11 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Nicely done. The rigid structure of the bridge contrasts nicely with the more organic structure of the rocky shoreline. The more free-flowing aspect of the sailboat also adds both structural and tonal contrast. All in all, a very pleasing photograph. |
Jun 10th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 11
|
66 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Thanks, Emil. I like what you've done. |
Jun 10th |
66 |
Jun 22 |
Reply |
Thanks, Gary. I agree it could use a bit more contrast, maybe not as much as your version, but I like where you're going here. |
Jun 8th |
66 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Terrific image and it's fun seeing an example from someone using Rad's technique. I really like Gary's processing, but I personally prefer your original crop. It feels more dramatic. |
Jun 6th |
66 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Well seen, Palli. The tree works really well against the white foliage. I do prefer your second crop in response to Arik's comments. I'm not really loving Gary's bark extension, though I think you'd do well do darken the bare wood a bit. All it all, good inspiration. I need to spend more time walking through the woods with my IR camera. |
Jun 6th |
66 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Love this. It has a Clyde Butcher kind of feel to it. No suggestions. |
Jun 6th |
66 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
This is a terrific scene for IR, especially monochrome IR. I do think it would benefit from an increase in contrast and a bit of dodging and burning. I went ahead and made a few adjustments of my own including a slight vignette. |
Jun 6th |
 |
66 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
I like this a lot, especially your framing of the lone dormer. I also like the idea of flipping it (something I do a lot in my own work). It's true that it doesn't scream "abandoned", but that's OK. It works. |
Jun 6th |
66 |
Jun 22 |
Comment |
Lovely scene, perfect for IR. I agree with others about composition and your treatment of the buildings and foreground. I also have to agree that the clouds in the upper right are a bit overcooked. |
Jun 6th |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 66
|
11 comments - 2 replies Total
|