|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 86 |
Apr 25 |
Reply |
I've wondered about this - my understanding is that PSA doesn't limit pixel dimensions - rather it limits file size. I appreciate that two are correlated. When I download you image, import into LR, and view at 100% (where one pixel on my screen corresponds to one pixel in your image) - the structure in the foreground doesn't appear sharp. I don't think it's a file size/resolution issue. Might be what the phone actually focused on? Or some dirt on the lens? Or something else? In my experience - it's not an inherent limitation of the iPhone camera (sometimes it's great!). |
Apr 13th |
| 86 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
Nice image - tulips are a great subject! I like that you isolated one tulip to focus on and found a frame without buildings/tourists. I think the top and right sides of the tulip are too close to the edge of the frame; feels crowded. The tulip needs more room to breathe. |
Apr 12th |
| 86 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
I like the framing of the Washington Monument by the barren tree. The purple-pink flowers give the scene a Spring vibe! On the other hand they obscure part of the monument. So many great photo ops in Washington! |
Apr 8th |
| 86 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
Interesting scene - seems like there were many opportunities to move around to vary the alignment of the structures. The greenery helps frame the subject. The tourists in modern clothes (esp the blue and red) detract from the scene; depending on intended use - you could choose to remove them. What are the structure made of? The focus looks a little soft on my monitor; perhaps due to the low resolution of the posted image. What do you think? |
Apr 8th |
| 86 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
Nice flower - great purple color. I find the greenery a bit distracting - very busy and bright. Not much you could do in-camera to improve this. There are some opportunities in post to desatutrate/darken the green color. A vignette might help. |
Apr 8th |
| 86 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
The blue sky and blurred clouds are great. Don't give up on this tree . . . hopefully it will mature and bear more fruit! |
Apr 8th |
| 86 |
Apr 25 |
Reply |
I agree with you. I tried to highlight the subject with light - but I agree there are still too many distracting elements. Thank you. |
Apr 8th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 86
|
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Reply |
Thank you. I'll play with bringing out the shadows under the wing. Good suggestion. |
Apr 14th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Reply |
Highly recommend Photo AI! Its three components (gigapixel, denoise and sharpen) can be controlled independently. Nothing better for those kinds of edit. |
Apr 12th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Reply |
What's causing the blur on the right side? Plants near the lens? Regarding the third person - although he initially distracted me - I find that his presence increases my interest in the image - as I wonder who is is. |
Apr 12th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Reply |
Interesting comment about people "seeing" different things. I didn't see the pink tulip :) |
Apr 11th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
What a soft/dreamy image - the two people embracing are sharp - I can feel their connection. The edges have an interesting blur. I wonder who is the person in the back/right - and what is his relationship to the young couple. A proud parent? Can you explain how you achieved the blur? In camera or in post? |
Apr 7th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
I like that you transformed a very clinical/institutional scene - into something much warmer that could be someone's living room. I like that you kept the variation in leaf lighting and also the shadows. One question - there is a dark linear reflection (?) on the table surface (also present in the original) that I find a little distracting. What do you think that is? I like the reflection of the lighter wood on the table surface. |
Apr 6th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
Interesting image - agree with comments above. Without your explanation, I would not have understood what I was looking at. The lighting is interesting - not sure what is the darker band just below the very bright area. I think there may be some opportunity to bring out more texture in the tile-like surface. Not sure if OM has the feature - but with Canon I find auto-ISO a good way to adjust to changing light. Without that - I often forget to check all settings as the scene changes. |
Apr 6th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
Tulips are a great Spring subject! I love the red color - and also that you achieved pleasing bokeh (foreground and background) despite the f9 aperture; likely due to the fact that you were pretty close to the flower of primary interest. Do you think the tree trunk helps or hurts the image? |
Apr 6th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
very creative architectural image. I like that the glass panes are different sizes/shapes - and you captured both linear and circular reflections. That breaks up the monotony. All the repetitive diagonals create interest. |
Apr 6th |
| 87 |
Apr 25 |
Comment |
Interesting image - I like that we all know now exactly what this is - despite the almost complete silhouette. Looks like the bird is carrying a branch - that always adds interest. To my eye there is a brownish hue over the image - not sure if that was the scene or something added in your processing. I don't think it helps the image - my preference would be for a cleaner/B&W version (one example attached). Birds in flight are tough to capture - nice job with this one! |
Apr 6th |
 |
6 comments - 4 replies for Group 87
|
11 comments - 6 replies Total
|
