|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Reply |
Very nice, thank you!
|
Aug 12th |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Reply |
Thanks, I missed the bucket! Do you think darkening the fields in the door with dodge and burn would work?
|
Aug 11th |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Reply |
Yep, the color of the sky is the maker's preference, and I find that many people don't understand these images unless they are photographers. They don't understand that the camera can do more than the human eye.
I still think that the crop more as a rectangle would be more in aligned with the shape of the lighthouse. |
Aug 10th |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Interesting, since I haven't seen man made snow before, we get it for real here in Seattle area. The blue tube has "tub" on it, so I guess that is what the thing is. What fun they are having! You have caught their expressions well, and the angle of sliding down is correct. I'm not sure how to improve the image,whether it is snow or sand. I agree with Becca the girl on the right needs her face lightened. YOu have a story here with both girls having fun. |
Aug 10th |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Wonderful perspective, and a nice title. I would take out the leaf on the lower right. I like the stem going into the water, and the shadow on the flower. Seems a different kind of lily that I am used to seeing - very unusual to see it sticking up out of the water instead of floating on it. |
Aug 10th |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
No idea about the 1:17 thing, I've never heard that, and I shoot micro 4/3. We are talking about ratios. If you can fill the frame in your camera, literally the size of your sensor, then aren't you doing macro 1:1? It wouldn't matter the size of a sensor, the fact is you are creating a 1:1 ratio of what your camera can do.
I don't think that because I can read this newspaper you have a macro image. If I could see the fibers in the paper that would be a macro image. |
Aug 10th |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Very sharp, clear and a good catch, I like the idea of a duck snuggled down into its feathers. Wonderful as an abstract and making you look twice. I love the landscape silhouette in its eye. What a wonderful image! Don't change anything. |
Aug 10th |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Oh, ouch, these bee comments can sting a bit! Frankly I think your been needs more detail, and that might come from lightening up its face - or do I have the wrong end of the bee?
sorry about the puns...
Lauren |
Aug 10th |
| 27 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
This is very well done. I like the process that you used, and I am amazed that the light could be reduced from the lighthouse and still get the Milky Way. I am wondering if you could lighten more the hills behind the lighthouse, enough to see more of the line of horizon? Also the color of the sky is often a debated discussion in star shots; my preference leans towards more of a midnight blue. I can see that you darkened the foreground left front, but is there more information below that? If you cropped more in from the side,the crop would be more rectangular, and less square - I think the length of the lighthouse would balance the photo more. Beautiful image, very well done!
|
Aug 10th |
6 comments - 3 replies for Group 27
|
| 79 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Thank you everyone, especially Karl for the work, I do like the darker background. For all of you that have never seen it flower I wonder did you know this baby was about 6 feet tall? A very fun plant to grow, but warning - bees LOVE them! |
Aug 25th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 79
|
7 comments - 3 replies Total
|