|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 26 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Hi Kirsty, you have kept our eyes busy looking at your creative images, one after the other. I think you have a different way of seeing your objects, more on the abstract aspect. You have taken the warm tone away from the image and certainly the cold colors are more effective. Waiting to see your next image with a tripod. |
Feb 20th |
| 26 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
A strongly built tree with solid and thick trunk. Thanks to your aperture used, most of the tree is sharp. Including the canopy is good as it creates a solid base for the tree to branch out. The HDR looks natural. My only suggestion is to crop the right side of the image so that the tree and its branches fill the frame. |
Feb 20th |
| 26 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
A very good image with ICM and I like the colors and lines. Inserting a bird is a creative idea and I think the bigger bird is more compelling. As Bob has suggested, the latter image has better contrast. Instead of using Gaussian + motion blur I wonder if you would just try motion blur at the wing and tail of the bird? |
Feb 20th |
| 26 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
I like the triangular formation of the top of the church, a simple but solid composition. The blue and white colors work well together and the bells and their shadows are interesting. A nice picture. May be including the cross at the top of the blue dome is perfect but not possible as you have mentioned. |
Feb 20th |
| 26 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
I like this lovely family swimming with the tiny ones following closely to their mother( I assume). You have done a good job to denoise and sharpen them to an acceptable level. I agree with Mervyn that the vegetations at the background can be a bit distracting but there is limitation to change too much in case you would use the image in the Nature genre. |
Feb 19th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 26
|
5 comments - 0 replies Total
|