|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 35 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
I agree with Helen about leaving the grass to anchor the foreground. I often include things like this and have been chastised by others. But, I would suggest darkening the grass a little, e.g pulling a gradient up from the bottom. The viewers eye will then look away from the dark, upward, to the light area of interest. (Old trick I learned from works by the Hudson School.)
I see you are having fun with DAP! You can do an amazing amount of image interpretation with that program. Please show more. |
Jun 10th |
| 35 |
Jun 20 |
Reply |
While the sky has that "long exposure" looks it was actually a normal short exposure. Just that how they were that evening.
I love the ripples in the gypsum sand although it had rained a day before so they are not as sharp as they can be. |
Jun 10th |
| 35 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Delicate is not a word I usually associate with IR images. But you have created a deliciously delicate image here. Nicely done Debbie. |
Jun 9th |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 35
|
| 56 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
Why can I never find such still water?
Nicely done, so calming.
I think you might have brought in a bit of those horizontal floaters in the original to give a little visual break to the foreground. |
Jun 24th |
| 56 |
Jun 20 |
Comment |
What a lovely interpretation. I think the detail in the whites is just right, anymore burning and it would lose that delicate texture. |
Jun 24th |
| 56 |
Jun 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Nancy,
There is just something about these three that attracts me. I keep having the sense the right most bird is surfing down the roofline.
I don't know what this style of painting is called but I am just happy I could rescue something from the dreary original.
|
Jun 24th |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 56
|
4 comments - 2 replies Total
|