|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 30 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Bath Time is a great name!! I think this interesting, but it looks very text book, like you are just showing an example of what a buffalo looks like. I think Dorinda's suggestion for cropping make the image more interesting and impactful. |
Feb 14th |
| 30 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Interesting image of the snow. I like the abstract quality as well. Did you enhance that blue color? I never know how to make snow interesting in a shot and I think this works. |
Feb 14th |
| 30 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Nice image. I would try to exaggerate the clarity a little. It brings out more details in an image. You have to play with it, because their is a blanche that can make it look over processed, but it may give a little more depth to the image. I like the contrast of different textures agains each other too. |
Feb 14th |
| 30 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I think this is great image. I wouldn't crop it in because I think the negative space created by the water around the duck works very well. The back of the water seems oddly out of focus as compared to the first, and I am not sure if that was on purpose. I like the molten metal feel of the water as well. I love anything water! |
Feb 14th |
| 30 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Thank you all for your thoughtful comments!! I was going to reply to each one, but I thought I would just do it here. I'm going to try some of those ideas of getting rid of the orange dot and trying to burn out the brightness in the upper left. I'll post the results! |
Feb 14th |
| 30 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I agree the foreground would not be better in silhouette. I like the mood of this image and I think having slight variations in color works well with the foreground. I think what is just above the foreground is a little blurry. It almost looks as if it was added as an after thought, or you smudged in photo shop. |
Feb 14th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 30
|
| 57 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Love the color. I think it is a nice image, but I feel the bee is the only visitor in focus. It might have also worked if all the visitors were in focus. I would have also cropped a little off center, with more background to the left of the thistle. |
Feb 18th |
| 57 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I think the arm works well in the image. It is a necessary piece because it gives context to the glass. I think the composition is great. I agree with Cindy that you might want to try to tone down some of the highlight on the finger tips because they seem to be too bright, but don't mess with it too much. This is really fun image! |
Feb 18th |
| 57 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Great image! I like the composition and you really captured the whole flower sharply. The flower dust is a little blurry on the one leaf closer to the viewer, but it doesn't bother me that much. I also like how you can see bits of the there flowers in the background so you get sense of where you are. |
Feb 18th |
| 57 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I would never have guessed that was scrap book paper. I occasionally use a wood plank background for the real thing as well. The problem with mine is the quality of the paper is a little flimsy. Anyway, back to your image. I love the colors and the entire peach is in focus. I like the painterly feel you get. I also like the way you darkened the background a little just to make the peach stand out better. Very nicely done. |
Feb 18th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 57
|
10 comments - 0 replies Total
|