|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
It is very nice to have included the Rocky Mountains. Here in the States, the auroras are usually so faint that only the retina's rods, which do not register color, respond. Thus, our eyes will see faint sploches in the sky, but our cameras will reveal their true color. I went to Finland in January to see the auroras, where I was lucky enough to see auroras in full color with my naked eye. Perhaps I'll post on of my resulting photos. |
Apr 14th |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I feel the same as has been expressed above. |
Apr 14th |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Interesting geometry and smart crop. |
Apr 14th |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Nice trails. I'd like pictures including tail ligts of cars to show their true red color. The reason such photographs make the tail lights orange is because the bright tail light blows the red, but not the yellow, leading to relative over representation of the yellow, resulting in the orange. A filter that specifically attenuates yellow and red would fix the problem, but it should be possible in post to restore the true color of the tail lights. |
Apr 14th |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I like IR photographs because the end result is a B&W photo with high contrast, which I like. This one is no exception. I haven't looked up iPhone IR, but from your original, it looks like it uses a deep red filter and the image is processed as a monochrom. Do you IR experts know how far into the true infra red part of the spectrum the iPhone is sensitive, and how the resulting sensitivity spectrum compares to that of the human eye? |
Apr 14th |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Just back from two weeks hiking in Japan, hence my tardy comments. Actually, I have nothing to add other than that with nothing in front of or behind the bird, a shallow depth of field is unnecessary. I wonder if the bird would have been still sharper if you had shot at f/8? |
Apr 14th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 78
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|