|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 30 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
I like the natural feel of the sky and the way the foreground complements the mountains. I'd like it more if there were more cropping from the top and if that orange area in the foreground were more to one side or the other. In this context, what does "tapped out" mean? |
Aug 7th |
| 30 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
I very much like the lighting and the sharpness. To me, it would be a tad nicer if the background texture on the right were a little less prominent, and on the left, a little more prominent. |
Aug 2nd |
| 30 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
I quite like this scene, partly because it reminds me of the West, where I grew up. I prefer this in B&W because the contrast can be increased and the blown part of the sky can be disguised. Although I much prefer that only minimal changes be made to the objects in an image, I do prefer that the boulder that is in the center of the foreground be more off to the side. It pained me to do it, but I enlarged it and moved it in the version I'm posting. |
Aug 1st |
 |
| 30 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
This looks very nice in B&W. I found that I liked it even more after increasing the contrast a bit. When I zoom in somewhat, the image looks a bit posterized. It might be worth looking at each step in your processing to see which introduced it, and then perhaps back off just a bit on that transformation. |
Aug 1st |
| 30 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
This is lovely with its luscious whites and and nice balance. I also like the perfect balance of sharpness and blur. Shouldn't the title be Guggenheim? |
Aug 1st |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 30
|
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
The perspective has a comfortable feel, and the trees on either edge provide a nice frame. Fortunately, the sun was at a good angle to provide interesting shadows. Many times, an image looks more natural "facing" to the right. As this is a documentation photo, would it be a sacrilege to reverse it left to right? |
Aug 21st |
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Reply |
Thank you for your comment. Yes, focus stacking provides many opportunities. I'm glad someone liked the title. When I saw the processed image, I couldn't help myself. |
Aug 21st |
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
Thanks also Stuard and Sarita. |
Aug 15th |
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
Thank you Heather, Michael, and Holly. |
Aug 10th |
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
I like the lighting, and of course, the subject itself. |
Aug 7th |
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
I like the pattern of the lines. I'd prefer that the colors not be so saturated. |
Aug 7th |
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
It is a very nice composition and well suited to B&W. The processing seems just right. I wouldn't mind if a little more of his face were visible, but you really had no choice. |
Aug 7th |
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
Nice sunlight, nice colors overall, and I also like the fact that the whites show a nice range and display some texture throughout. Yes, it would be nicer if the swan(?) were doing something exciting. |
Aug 5th |
| 42 |
Aug 22 |
Comment |
This has the same feel as your April and November images--same camera? The composition of the scene is most interesting. The colors seem quite distorted, but I've not been able to shift them so that the scene feels more real. |
Aug 1st |
8 comments - 1 reply for Group 42
|
13 comments - 1 reply Total
|