|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Reply |
Jack, yes California does afford images like this in the mountains and even the campus of Stanford (with or without air pollution from fires) |
Sep 26th |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Reply |
Thank you Henry for the comments. Too much crop will pinch the top and exclude the feel of outer space. |
Sep 26th |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Reply |
Thanks Emil for the supportive comments. |
Sep 26th |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Reply |
Arik, it is interesting you suggest that the image might have come from a science fiction film. In processing, I kept thinking of scenes from the Alien series, e.g., Prometheus |
Sep 26th |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Reply |
Palli, I am going to miss your comments, and even more, the images you share. I understand you must put family first, but when you can, pick up your camera again. |
Sep 26th |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Reply |
I too, like the X-Catholic I am, feel a bit sinful using colors with IR. The compromise is keeping it monochromatic. I like your pano suggestion . . . but maybe slightly less pano because the "sky" is on the edge of earth's atmosphere. |
Sep 18th |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Comment |
Emil, it is easy to see why you selected this shot. The river as a leading line to the bridge framed in by trees and foliage. This is a graceful image. Darkening the bridge did make it stand out more, and the dodging you did countered the even lighting you were given. |
Sep 2nd |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Comment |
Palli, I too am attracted to images that contrast the free form of nature against the linearity of human made objects and buildings. How you processed the foliage, strongly brought out this contrast. |
Sep 1st |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Comment |
Jack, the depth of field is strong near but fades after the ruins, but this is desirable if you want attention on the foreground and ruins. The story told by the exposed tree roots and tumbling ruins is a tale about the indifference of time, which you captured so well. |
Sep 1st |
| 66 |
Sep 24 |
Comment |
Melanie, again, this photograph could have been taken by Dorothea Lange. IR picks up tonality differently than regular cameras. It would be interesting to do a comparison. I like your capture of the woman looking down, yet towards you. |
Sep 1st |
4 comments - 6 replies for Group 66
|
| 88 |
Sep 24 |
Reply |
Brian, if you can, you must visit the Canadian Rockies. It will define landscape photography for you.
|
Sep 26th |
| 88 |
Sep 24 |
Reply |
Thank you for the kind comments. Let's wish that wildfires can be prevented. |
Sep 26th |
| 88 |
Sep 24 |
Comment |
Brian, what a splendid use of light. Because you picked the right time of day and the perfect location, you didn't need to do much to process this gorgeous image. Thanks for sharing it. |
Sep 25th |
| 88 |
Sep 24 |
Comment |
Sanat, I like the nearly monochrome composition you have created. Using the road to lead the viewer into the image to join the hikers is effective. I like the cool wintery feel of this image. |
Sep 25th |
| 88 |
Sep 24 |
Comment |
Brian, although the sky is nearly overexposed in the original, you saved it in post-processing. The green tones in the pines shifted towards blue from the original to your final image, and that's ok, if this is what you wanted. If not, selection tools can be used to work on small sections of an image. A train rounding a bend is a classic image. |
Sep 25th |
| 88 |
Sep 24 |
Comment |
Quang, I like the ironic elements of this composition. The juxtaposition of the geese and swan with the military aircraft is interesting. Peace indeed: geese usually have conflicts with swans. My eye wants the kayaker removed, but other than that, I don't have much to add. |
Sep 25th |
4 comments - 2 replies for Group 88
|
8 comments - 8 replies Total
|