|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 66 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
Gary, you're making a fair point. There's something dissonant between the sky and foreground. Working now on adjustments, thanks once again for the useful constructive comments |
Nov 22nd |
| 66 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
Arik, I agree, the sky doesn't fit. Thanks for the helpful comments |
Nov 22nd |
| 66 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Palli, this image, for me, is a chapel created in a natural setting. How you used the tree as a frame and the tonality of the highlights creates a space wherein one can easily image that the model is in a spiritual place contemplating the big questions. Splendid work. |
Nov 22nd |
| 66 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Gary, can't say what's cooler, the 1950 Studebaker, or the AI application to it. My first car was a Studebaker, so, my comments will be biased. The AI insertion of background is very believable and it elaborates the artistry of the image. While I can understand PSA's rules on the use of AI with a source not created by the photographer, if the program allows a background supplied by the photographer (as can be done with sky replacement), wouldn't entry of such an image be acceptable? |
Nov 22nd |
| 66 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Jack, unlike the others, I rather like the highlights and how they setoff the lane. The color filter adds the right mood to make this an image you want to walk into |
Nov 20th |
| 66 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Arik, like the others, I enjoy the metal blue tones you created in the sky. Indeed, this is a portrait of a tree. My eye wants the impossible, namely, separation between the lower right side of the tree and the foliage growing into it. Short of bring a sickle with you when you shoot, I don't know what can be done . . . if anything needs to be done.
I am very much looking forward to your workshop on AI |
Nov 20th |
| 66 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Melanie, I have a lot of these images of dilapidated sheds and barns, many with foliage growing wildly around them. You composed your image nicely, but you still may have a challenge defining what the subject is. These are busy, complex images. My eye wants more contrast between the shed and grass in the foreground, perhaps achieved by using a selection tool to lighten the grass and darken the barn? |
Nov 20th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 66
|
| 88 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Brian, you definitely captured the place where you had memorable experiences as a tourist. Avoiding the crocs is a part of the story you must keep. Your treatment of the sky improved the image. |
Nov 28th |
| 88 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Sanat, I like what you did with cropping and increasing saturation. Trey suggested some changes that you might consider. |
Nov 28th |
| 88 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
Trey, I like what you did with the Stamp Tool. The gray sky conflicted with the autumn colors. Thanks for the help. |
Nov 28th |
| 88 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Trey, the crop really increased the power of this image. Again, through your post processing skills you have made an ordinary image extraordinary |
Nov 22nd |
| 88 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Mark, this image does allow the viewer to pause and savor the colors of autumn. By putting the bridge in the center, you have made it the primary subject. It is also more in focus than the trees behind it. You could, if you wish, draw more attention to it by selecting it to darken it. You might also consider decreasing the clarity of the trees behind it. This location would be good for a winter shot once the snow falls? |
Nov 22nd |
4 comments - 1 reply for Group 88
|
9 comments - 3 replies Total
|