|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 34 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
The problem to my eye is the difference between the sharp bird image and the soft flower image. The radial blur solves the problem. |
Jan 28th |
| 34 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
You've done a great job combining so many elements. My only comment is that the scale of the sailboat is slightly too large. |
Jan 28th |
| 34 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
To my eye, the soft focus of the foreground stones, and the hard line where the dancer's foreground just ends, make the subject seem crowded. |
Jan 28th |
| 34 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I would try Onelab's 'gloss texture' filter. |
Jan 28th |
| 34 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I am confused by this. To me, the clouds are too dominant and distract from the subject transformation. |
Jan 28th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 34
|
| 68 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
Great depth throughout. The low saturation adds to the feeling. |
Jan 28th |
| 68 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
Well done, but there is some confusion behind the boy's straw. |
Jan 28th |
| 68 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
Perfect lighting and sharp image. I love that she's leaning into the window. |
Jan 28th |
| 68 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
This has great depth, but the busyness and uneven contrast obscures the subject. |
Jan 28th |
| 68 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
This illustrates one of my complaints about the W3. Because the nearest subject is quite separated from the rest of the image, the depth seems unnatural. The W3 captures the close depth well. But the background depth falls off quickly due to the W3's limited stereo base. The result is the close subject seeming isolated, while the scene seems flat due to the'cardboarding' effect. |
Jan 28th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 68
|
10 comments - 0 replies Total
|