|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 34 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Nicely done. Not to my taste, but appropriate for the purpose. To me, the extra halos correctly evoke ascension. |
Nov 7th |
| 34 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Unlike Gunter, I love the saturated yellow (of course I do). I agree though, that the bee could be larger. Alternately, you could embrace the size disparity, and make the colors more abstract (yeah, that also sounds like something I'd say). |
Nov 7th |
| 34 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Very nice. Great color and leading lines. I might have added a vignette or shadow to soften the sharp edge at the top left. A light flare might work too. |
Nov 7th |
| 34 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Excellent. Great colors and lines. You've done a good job making the trees and flowers seem individual. The silhouettes are perfectly placed. If I changed anything, it would be to give the trees on the right a bit more distance from the frame, and between. It would make the perspective feel more natural. |
Nov 7th |
| 34 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Very nice. A clear improvement from the original. I might have sized her slightly smaller, and integrated the floral pattern on her jacket more prominently. |
Nov 7th |
| 34 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
I love the colors and composition of this. The proportions and leading lines are well considered. The compositing brings out a lot of detail. It definitely creates more interest than the original. I see two things. One is that the three leaves are clearly identical. The light spot near the top curve is especially obvious. If you cloned it out differently for two of the leaves, the rest of the similarities would not be obvious. The other is the layer order. To my eye, the largest layer should be at the front, to keep continuity with the layer proportions, and imply more depth. |
Nov 2nd |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 34
|
| 68 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
Thanks! I'll try that. |
Nov 28th |
| 68 |
Nov 23 |
Reply |
It's already sharpened as much as I dare. |
Nov 17th |
| 68 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Another 'stand out' phantogram. A really crisp image with clearly defined depth. Even the pseudo view is comfortable and interesting. It could use a bit of warmth, color wise. The bright white light with the bright white background is a bit sterile. Also it feels a bit crowded in the window. |
Nov 9th |
| 68 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
:) I have been there several times. I helped run a festival for many years near there. We donated to the foundation (and other local community groups) every year.
The color and depth are good, considering the angle you had to work with. But the grey wall reduces the depth effect, and the black poles (especially the one in the center) make it hard to see the image as one continuous photo. |
Nov 9th |
| 68 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
Excellent depth. Great color and interest. I like what you did with the sign. The only minor error I see is a slight disparity around the person in the lift chair. My favorite part is the tractor pulling the circus wagon in the background. |
Nov 6th |
| 68 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
There's a lot of interest here. The way the shadows evoke railroad tracks. The 'roof that isn't a roof'. And even the slight disparity of the moving people actually evokes movement rather than discomfort. My only complaint is that the framing feels a bit tight. |
Nov 2nd |
| 68 |
Nov 23 |
Comment |
I love this! The colors, the contrast, the leading lines (including z-axis), and the bold negative space. It all works well. |
Nov 2nd |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 68
|
11 comments - 2 replies Total
|