|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 34 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
I agree that removing the tower would be an improvement. I also agree it's a bit dark. The one thing that looks out of place to me is that the hard light on the cat doesn't match the rest of the image. |
Jun 19th |
| 34 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Excellent. Everything matches, down to the bokeh. The one thing that matches slightly too much is the corners of the perforated edge. In the bottom row you rotated the frame, so it isn't as obvious. Not critical, but my pedantic eye was drawn to the top three having exactly the same shapes. |
Jun 19th |
| 34 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
I love every part of this except the border. I also agree that the lower part is texturaly mismatched. |
Jun 19th |
| 34 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
The composite is excellent. The black background is good, but it lacks separation from the subject. A bit of light on the background might bring out more of the character of the cups. |
Jun 19th |
| 34 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
I agree with Gunter about the crop being slightly uncomfortable. Despite that I also agree with Mike that it would make a good print. |
Jun 19th |
| 34 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
I like the concept. And the elements work well together. But the end result is too busy. The leading lines become confused, and elements of interest are diminished. It could be saved by one dominant element being highlighted. For example if you brightened the area around the snail in her hand or put a glow in the lighthouse, it would pull the viewer in and give them an anchor in the confusion. |
Jun 19th |
| 34 |
Jun 23 |
Reply |
No, but I did try to match the color of my ghost to the 'shoulders' (the base of the light) at the bottom. |
Jun 7th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 34
|
| 68 |
Jun 23 |
Reply |
Dr T does good work. |
Jun 13th |
| 68 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
The lens works well at this range. Is it modified for closer focus? |
Jun 13th |
| 68 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Excellent depth! The color could use a bit more saturation, but that's subjective. I don't remember the bollards being in the series. They must have been added more recently.
...Be seeing you. |
Jun 13th |
| 68 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
A great image, although the highlights are a bit hot. The placement of the person is good, but it seems a bit off. I think the parallax depth in the image is greater that that of the person, making them seem a bit flat in the shoulder and derriere. |
Jun 13th |
| 68 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Good depth, but the large white wall hurts my eyes. It's too bad their faces aren't more visible, it would give the image more interest and connection to the viewer. |
Jun 13th |
| 68 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Nice image, with a good visual pun (drifts in the driftless). The almost monochrome nature of the colors give your anaglyph clarity. |
Jun 13th |
| 68 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Good composition and focus. Good depth. Could be pulled closer to the window for more viewable anaglyph. |
Jun 13th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 68
|
12 comments - 2 replies Total
|