|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 21 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
Wow. This combines elements of expressionism, cubism, and surrealism. I like how the skyline appears closer than in the original. |
Jul 18th |
| 21 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
It has a lot of contrast, but still a lot of texture. It has an almost 'burned' feeling about it. I wonder how it would look as a sepiatone. |
Jul 18th |
| 21 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
Excellent. It looks a lot like a watercolor painting. My only suggestion would be to select the darkest areas and soften them a bit. |
Jul 18th |
| 21 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
That's a lot of symbolism. And your treatment has made it even more expressive. I'm pretty sure the dripping paint was intentional.
If you search google images for Nathan Bowen Street Art, you'll get more context. |
Jul 18th |
| 21 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
A very nice image. I am trying to learn more about displacement maps. I would be interested in how you got this effect. |
Jul 18th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 21
|
| 68 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
An excellent subject with good depth. I agree the focus is a bit soft, and there is a slight window error at the bottom edge. |
Jul 18th |
| 68 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
I like the corrected window, but I wonder if those ladies add interest to the subject, or distract from it? |
Jul 18th |
 |
| 68 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
A good concept, but it needs to be 4 layers if there are clouds in front and behind. |
Jul 18th |
| 68 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
An interesting image. I agree that the window violation is distracting.You could simply adjust it in SPM, but you would lose the pop out effect. I think it would look better if it was cropped to portrait aspect, and any remaining violation could be cloned out easily. |
Jul 18th |
| 68 |
Jul 19 |
Comment |
An excellent composition. And a beautiful and interesting subject with good depth. The relief in the lower center really draws the eye through. My only suggestion would be to somehow bring more clarity to the dark areas. If the contrast could be reduced without losing sharpness, it would be spectacular. |
Jul 17th |
| 68 |
Jul 19 |
Reply |
Thanks! A good suggestion. |
Jul 10th |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 68
|
10 comments - 1 reply Total
|