|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 24 |
Dec 21 |
Reply |
Thanks Gaetan. It looks much better now. |
Dec 15th |
| 24 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Tom This is a beautiful photo. Superb color variation, nice colors. Blackish background adds beauty to the image. Top marks! |
Dec 15th |
| 24 |
Dec 21 |
Reply |
Good work. Looks much better now. |
Dec 15th |
| 24 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Gaetan, You seem to have improved the original photo providing more clarity. Jim has also improved the image.
The background seems to be too busy for me. Although there is a leading line, I can't find an interesting focus point. |
Dec 6th |
| 24 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Good composition, well-balanced landscape, vivid subtle colors, well-lit foreground, good depth of field. Top marks! |
Dec 5th |
| 24 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Albert, It is a beautiful scene that you captured. Unfortunately, your photo looks so dark on my computer. Both Jim and Tom have improved a lot and now the beauty of the scene is clearly seen. |
Dec 5th |
| 24 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Tam It would be nice if you have given the original as well. It is a good landscape scene. I don't know the f value you used, but the depth of field seems to be bit on the lower side as some details are not clear.
If I take this photo, I would have moved more to the left so that the arch would be more at the middle. |
Dec 5th |
| 24 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Your edited photo looks much different to the original, which is on a very high level. All the editing techniques seem to have improved the image quality substantially. Vivid colors and good details make a good impact.
If it is mine, I would have kept a little more gap at the top. |
Dec 4th |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 24
|
6 comments - 2 replies Total
|
