|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 34 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Thanks Steve. Point taken. My kitchen tiles!! |
Apr 13th |
| 34 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
My biggest problem is having the idea!! I am sure I will get plenty from this group!! |
Apr 3rd |
| 34 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Thanks, Jan. Yes, I did use a Wacom stylus pen. I am sure I could not have done the faces with a mouse!. |
Apr 3rd |
| 34 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I wouldn't even know where to start to get something like this!!. It is really good and I like the final image better than the original. I like the way it looks as if you are winking to the camera. The canvas texture finishes off a great image and a great colour pallette!! |
Apr 2nd |
| 34 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
A very different style portrait!! I see a monster in the colours staring out!! The face would have been lost without the glasses so well done for keeping them in.
|
Apr 2nd |
| 34 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
What a beautiful triptych!! I like the way you have displayed it onto a wall and it looks very effective. I do feel though that the triptych is good enough to be displayed by itself without being in a lounge setting!! The feet of the middle figure seem a bit lost so perhaps lighten the area a tad?
Well done. |
Apr 2nd |
| 34 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I think it is always a good exercise to look back on previous images and re-imagine them as you have here.
You have used a lovely texture and I like what looks to be light shafts coming in from top left. For me the vase looks a bit "floaty" and perhaps needs a slightly darker base for it to stand on? Just my view! |
Apr 2nd |
| 34 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Bob what a lovely way to remember your visit to Treland!!
I think you have done really well blending in all the elements and it really works. Unlike Sylvia, the roses on the left seem ok to me but I find that the figure of Dorinda too sharp and looks cut out? Perhaps you could feather the cut out a bit more to help it blend in better?
Well done. |
Apr 2nd |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 34
|
| 41 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Well done, Hazel.
It mmight have been easier to fix the flower stationery and move the camera? |
Apr 10th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 41
|
| 81 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Makes me cold just looking at the image!!.
Like the way you have managed to get more colouring to show where the suns rays are on the snow and exposure has been handled well.
Perhaps a slightly more narrow border but that is just my opinion.
Well done. |
Apr 4th |
| 81 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Great shot of the train crossing the bridge. I really like the colours of the foreground.
Real shame there is no details in the sky. I wonder whether a crop would help? See what you think? |
Apr 4th |
 |
| 81 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Beautiful!!! The colours are all so vibrant and the Mandala is so well done. Sharp as a pin and cannot fault it. Well done.
|
Apr 1st |
| 81 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Never seen a flower like this before!!
Beautiful colour and I like the other, smaller flower in the background.
I did wonder whether a closer crop would be better? So, as you know me, I had a go!! I cropped in and then blurred the BG a bit more to bring the main flower out more.
See what you think? |
Apr 1st |
 |
| 81 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Thanks Kurt. I was after just having a hint of the plate there but will try and get a bit more contrast. |
Apr 1st |
| 81 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Lovely still life and the placement of all is very well done. Lovely and sharp and exposure/colours spot on. If that is real Wedgewood you are lucky!!!
I do feel that it seems to be sloping towards the front and wonder whether a lower view point would have helped with that?
Well done. |
Apr 1st |
| 81 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I found it very hard to discern which image was the original and which the processed one so I hope I have got it right?
I think this would have been a lovely image but unfortuneatly none of it is sharp at all and that is a real shame. Exposure of the white areas is good and showing detail.
|
Apr 1st |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 81
|
12 comments - 4 replies Total
|