|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 81 |
Apr 20 |
Comment |
Powerful indeed, an image - the barbed wire and the treatment, plus the fall of light. Tad bit wider perspective may have opened up the wire on the left a bit more, I thought. Like Janet says, Sepia may look good too... |
Apr 9th |
| 81 |
Apr 20 |
Comment |
WOW! This is increaible Angela, your effort paid off.
But NOW you have to teach us - how you did it - what was it really? How did you get this sorta effect :-)? Please do |
Apr 9th |
| 81 |
Apr 20 |
Comment |
Very nice catch of the caterpillar! Details have come out quite well. I wish it was not such a close crop and the bend of the twig on the right was a bit longer in the frame... |
Apr 9th |
| 81 |
Apr 20 |
Comment |
Wow Randall, nice rendition.
First of all, thank you for seeing and leaving your comment on my Game Changers interview video :-). I am assuming it was YOU :)
Randall, topaz preset has given you a very dated and rustic effect. Suddenly looks like an old box, a painting, a coaster, or even a wall hanger! Do you really experiment with topaz? I donwloaded but never used it :)
Just wondering about the vignetting the corner-- would it be different if it was not done? |
Apr 9th |
| 81 |
Apr 20 |
Comment |
Really beautiful image - such a wonderful lighting and exposure, making it such a delicate flower. Colors are marvelous and I like the faded effect on the sides (right) and the focus on the left. Dreamy as Angela says, truly nicely done. |
Apr 9th |
| 81 |
Apr 20 |
Reply |
Angela, could you also pls throw some light on "specular highlights"? Where and what did you mean? |
Apr 9th |
| 81 |
Apr 20 |
Comment |
Thanks Janet. Droplets do look like planets. Had a little tough time with the lens tho. I dont know what they exactly are, the white specks - but could be some pattern of the previous oil drop on the glass dish. Thanks once again and sure I will try to remove the dust specks. |
Apr 9th |
| 81 |
Apr 20 |
Reply |
Thank you Angela for your comments. Could you pls change the title to "Celestial" :-)? Dust, I think you are right, perhaps I did not notice in the water. I could have removed in the PP, but left it bcos I was talking of celestial, which means, the space. And hence there could be clutter or unknown elements suspended or visible in space, right? Hence left it as it is :). but thanks for trying. Will you please send me the edited image on my email ID? I would love to see it more. BTW, the one in top (PIP) is the one I sent or the one you editeD? Confused :) |
Apr 9th |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 81
|
6 comments - 2 replies Total
|
