|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 2 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I love these types of rodeo shots---all the color and action make for good results.
I would suggest bumping up that shutter speed for peak action such as this. Best to be well above 1/1000 if you want real clarity in the image. Of course, you could slow it down even more and get creative. :-) |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 2
|
| 4 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Just a thought for future reference. When ever you have environmental scenes taken in any condition other that bright daylight when you put the image in Lightroom always take a chance and set your white balance. It often makes a bid difference and the good part is that if you don't like it you can always hit reset and start again.
Great eye for seeing this lovely scene. |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 4
|
| 7 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
The lighting is quite magical and that is what makes the image work. You do not mention your camera setting or it this was on a tripod or not. The over all image looks a bit soft. I would urge you to consider a tripod to make the rocks (especially those in the foreground) look sharper. Then the action of the water would be even more dramatic.
This must have been quite a thrill to capture. |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 7
|
| 16 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
The softness of the girl combined with the softness of the water make for a stellar image. The angelic feeling is quite powerful. |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 16
|
| 17 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
I noted the grainy issue with the clouds and thought I'd offer a suggestion or two.
If the image is correctly exposed and the ISO is not excessively high grain should not be a problem.
You do not mention you camera settings so I can't provide all the answers but consider the following:
Over sharpening produces a great deal of nasty grain. So does over processing.
In general, you could remove grain from the sky by doing selected adjustments. If you select the sky, then run noise reduction programs like LIghtroom, Camera Raw or Photoshop you can remove just about all the grain quite easily. |
Sep 25th |
| 17 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
It is the lovely golden light that makes this image sing. The light is simply everything. |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 17
|
| 22 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Nice job on taking something simple and making it look like extraordinary. |
Sep 11th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 22
|
| 27 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Great job of making something out of nothing.
This is creative and captures the imagination. The steam is what makes the shot work.
May I suggest doing something to darken that very white spot in the lower left corner. I really detracts from a will done image. |
Sep 11th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 27
|
| 32 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
You have a wonderful dramatic angle that makes the bridge look even higher than it actually is. Angles like this are seldom seen and thus they are more interesting.
I feel this would be even more powerful if you
had used the full tonal range and managed to get some true blacks and whites. |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 32
|
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for commenting. Somehow I've always seen B/W as more of a Fine Art style and never paid a great deal of attention to it. Now in my old age I'm starting to get more attached to doing things and B/W. I've spent some time reading about Ansel Adams and his work, and I've been able to lean on Arne, out group member, for guidance. I'm still very much a novice with B/W.
What I have found is you have to have the right image for B/W to be powerful. All images just do not seem to work. At least for me. |
Sep 24th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thank you Terry. I have not doe much B/W work but Arne, a group member here, has been encouraging me to give it a try.
All images don't work in B/W, at least in my opinion, but this one seemed to click. It took lots of dodging and burning but I like how it came out.
I give a lot of credit to my Nikon D800 and my 70-200mm lens. They really make the difference in detail and sharpness.
You should give it a try. |
Sep 24th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
You did a great job of editing this. I like what you did with the water and the love the sunbeam up in the left corner. |
Sep 17th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
I also noticed the blue/purple cast in the mountain shadows and up until several years ago I worked to get it out of my mountain images. Then I happened into a gallery shop of a highly respected and well known photographer in Estes Park Colorado (gateway to Rocky Mountain NP) and noticed the same cast in many of his images. I asked the photographer about that cast and he told me that I should look more closely when I was in the mountains and if I did I would see there often is a purple cast. He suggested I should remember the
song lyrics "purple mountain majesty". Since that conversation I have come to think of that purple cast as the personal choice of the artist. |
Sep 15th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Bill. I appreciate your suggestion.
Before I was "enlightened" by this group I rarely did B/W images. My color version of this image (not the unedited one shown here) has won 2 awards and has always been one of my favorites. |
Sep 15th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thank you for stopping by. I appreciate you looking and commenting. |
Sep 13th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for looking and commenting. I think I made some sort of adjustment on just about every inch of this image. If I remember correctly the final count included 27 different adjustment brush actions. They were mostly dodging and burning.
I did originally work on the color version but while in the process thought that the image had possibilies for a B/W image so gave it a try. |
Sep 13th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for looking. I have reworked the image and blurred the sun. er items I've also worked on the other suggestions.
I will enter the photo in a local camera club competition where a PSA judge is going to be doing the critiques.
Never fear, I'll keep working on the B/W stuff. I like the challenge. |
Sep 13th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
As presented you have an image of Paris on a rain soaked day that I am certain carries memories and meaning to you in regards to your trip to the City of Light. If your intent is to preserve this memory that the image works perfectly. Always remember that you, as the maker, determine what you want the image to be and your choice is always the right one. You mention the Statue of Liberty in your write up as being of some importance but as shown, a viewer will never notice the statue because it is so dwarfed by the sheer size of the city.
For me, the biggest issue is the lack of a meaningful subject that stands out. The eye of the viewer is automatically drawn to the lightest and brightest part of the image. In this case that is the river. My eye is drawn to the diagonal slash of the river crossing the image. Unfortunately the river itself is just bright and lacking in interest. There are also a number of distractions around the edges of the frame that cause the eye to drift. As George noted the building on the left and the railyard and road do not work well. I would suggest cropping them to remove the distraction. Additionally, the various bands of sky, trees and the alike at the top also serve little purpose, so I would crop them as well. Both of these crops make the river a stronger subject and have the added effect of drawing more attention to the Statue of Liberty as it is now larger.
With the given light on the river itself I can think of nothing to do that would add impact to the river. However using Lightroom I applied an auto tonal adjustment that on one click added detail to the city building, breathed some life into the foliage. Since you mentioned that you wanted to put this on canvas I added a touch of clarity that created depth and then used Lightroom's sharpening with the Amount set to 65, Radius set to .6 and Detail set to 75.
I've attached a sample worked from your thumbnail. Feel free to discard it should it not capture the mood you desire.
|
Sep 9th |
 |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I like the feeling created by this being shot from a low angle. This is something I feel is not used often enough by photographers. In this instance it bring me into the image and I feel like I'm part of the scene.
After reading your description I think you did a fine job of eliminating the cars and still keeping the feel of the rain. The thing I would change would be to crop the blurred man from the right. The other figures retain enough sharpness that it makes the figure on the left stand out. |
Sep 4th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I have always been a fan of High Key style images and this is no exception to that rule. When you have limited tones and colors it always draws more attention to the technical aspects of the image. In this case I feel that a bit of sharpness would help the trees. I like the diagonal lines as this also draws power to the image and adds impact.
With my limited knowledge of B/W I still feel that contrast help to improve B/W images. This I would increase the blacks to add to the contrast. I would also make a slight crop from the left---see my attachment. |
Sep 4th |
 |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Trying to capture a landscape in mid day light is generally does not yield a dramatic impactful image. The addition of the blank blue sky also limits impact. What you have is a solid image of the mountain.
Perhaps by selecting the sky and then darkening it and adding a darker GND filter across the bottom where the plants are visible would bring more attention to the mountain and also a bit of drama.
Michael also has a good idea in adding a bit of a vignette. The goal is to break up the vastness of the even light. |
Sep 4th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
First let me offer a technical suggestion. With nothing in your foreground, and your subject so far away you do not need f22. Your high aperture forced you to use an unnecessarily high ISO of 800. Lowering the aperture would have allowed you to bring the ISO to a more practical 400 or less.
The image feel a bit flat and dull so perhaps doing some dodging on the buildings would brighten them and add interest. You might also try raising the highlight across the city and even increase the white point all to bring a bit of life to the image.
While the panoramic format works well, you could crop the black area on the far right along with a bit from the left side to increase the impact of the main subject, the city.
I really do like the way you added some color to what basically looks like a B/W original.
|
Sep 4th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Dramatic light emanating from the Golden Hour provides the image with real impact. The central valley and the white clouds at the top center all serve as leading lines that point the viewer toward Half Dome. I like the fact that you r colors continue to brighten as your eye moves toward the right. This is a image worth framing.
If it were mine I would use a graduated ND filter to the upper right corner as it is considerably brighter than the rest of the image. Bringing that brightness down will make Half Dome pop out even more. |
Sep 4th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Michael
After reading your comment, I get the bit about cropping,and I'll do that shortly.
I actually worked pretty hard on bringing out those white trees at the bottom because I thought that white only having two tones to work with (black and white) that the area in the lower right would be too large and too dark without them. So am I right in thinking that you just want me to darken them a bit? Or should they be made much darker?
Remember I'm new to this B/W stuff and have no idea what I'm doing.
Thanks. |
Sep 4th |
| 36 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
I originally joined the DD groups because I wanted to become a better photographer and photo editor. While I appreciate the masters like Ansel Adams I have never been a great fan of B/W but looking at your images each month has given me a greater appreciation for the medium. You have made me want to try and, if not master, then get a grip on B/W. I've worked on it quite a bit, just not posted a lot of images.
I worked a lot on the smoke and the trees and I did crop some of the sky. Your comment, along with Michael's, makes me want to ask a question.
I'll crop some more from the top--after you mention it, I can see why. However, Michael mentions the white trees at the bottom. I actually worked on bringing out those trees because I thought without them the black hole at the bottom would be too much black. I'd be curious regarding your thoughts on that issue. Thanks. |
Sep 4th |
6 comments - 10 replies for Group 36
|
| 41 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
While the overall creative impulse is interesting, what makes the image work for me is the original picture of the forest and flowers. The angle from which you photographed the flower (from beneath and looking up at them) is most unusual and I feel creative. One hardly ever sees flower photos taken from such an angle. This is impressive and most creative. |
Sep 3rd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 41
|
| 46 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
You picked a great subject for the HDR and did a fine job of controlling both highlights and shadows. This is impressive. |
Sep 25th |
| 46 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I re3ally like this composition. I think the use of HDR makes this image come alive.
For me the city lights seem to lack sharpness. This makes me wonder how you went about capturing the 3 images. It would seem to me that there is some camera motion going on that keeps the images from matching perfectly. So first, did you adjust the setting for the three exposures manually? Did you automate the camera so you didn't have to touch it at all? Did you manually trip the shutter?? Did you use a cable release?
Just wondering... |
Sep 25th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 46
|
| 50 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I think Cindy is on to something about the leaves. To me they are a distraction. The bird is so bright and the contrasting background set it off quite well. Then there is that little annoyance in the leaves. Anything you can do to darken the leaves will greatly elevate the quality of this already fine image. |
Sep 25th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 50
|
| 60 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
In that I have been taught the importance of IMPACT and Story Line in evaluating a photo by a very wise acquaintance of ours I thought I would chime in.
For me the first image falls short in both Impact and Storyline. Impact suffers because the image appears to be too cluttered. The presence of the warrior is lost because he is only partially visible and the submissive nature of the priest, while visible is minimal. The fact he is in shadow adds to the distractions. In the first image the lion becomes a dominate part of the story and seems to detract from the goddess. Do we have competing subjects?
The second image carries a much greater impact. The elevated goddess remains dominant while the warrior adds a threatening atmosphere toward the priest. Here the priest seems to almost shrink and plead with the might of the goddess. The lion is reduced in importance and appears as a companion to the goddess, not a threat. Over all the meekness of the priest and power of the goddess tells a very gripping story.
For non western viewers the image will have interest because they will probably not have seen anything like this and certainly not up close.
I especially like the lighting. The seemingly celestial light from on high coming from the upper left adds drama and especially god like power. The light striking the priest is even more telling. Note that the light strikes the garments of the priest and not his face or upper body. While the light makes him visible, it diminishes his humanity and adds to the power of the goddess.
I feel the second image is by far the most IMPACTFUL.
So, did I apply our recent lessons adequately? :-) |
Sep 24th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 60
|
| 62 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I feel you have a dramatic image and one that you captured at peak action. While your subject is centered the huge of water balances the image nicely. I'll also offer kudos to Emil for his editing---he has a nice touch. I'll also agree with Bob----an image with noise is better than one with blur. I would suggest bumping up the ISO.
You might also consider cropping off the top 5 floors on the background buildings as it would bring more attention to the subject. |
Sep 11th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 62
|
| 64 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
You have got to love repeating lines!!!!! You have a great eye to see this and the skills to successfully capture it. Well done.
|
Sep 11th |
| 64 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Hey---thanks so much for the memories. I've photographed this church many times before all the geography changed. The old reflection pond added much drama.
In case you did not know---in late July and early August you can capture the Milky Way above the church for some real drama. Hope you get a change to try it. Also try it at daybreak when the alpen glow lights the peaks behind the church.
Congrats on this capture. |
Sep 11th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 64
|
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
Richard
When you brighten an image, if it makes the web too bright just do a bit of dodging and burning to selectively darken the web.
As a reference point my Smoky Mountain sunset posted in Group 36 actually has 31 different dodges or burns to get the results shown. |
Sep 11th |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I think I have seen more insect images this year than in my entire life!! I hear you joy in being able to get out again and your efforts were rewarded with a fine image.
The little trick of using a flash for a shot like this certainly does wonders for backgrounds and in this case the black adds a touch of drama to the wings.
I think the dry vine is a better prop than a leaf would have been. The sort of golden tones in the vine compliment the tones in the wings. I would like to suggest a bit of a more panoramic crop however. In that the damsel fly and the upper part of the branch are quite sharp and the lower part is such a mess I would just eliminate it. Check out my crop suggest that is attached. This is a quite nice image. |
Sep 11th |
 |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Glad you managed to get out and were able to get some different images.
You managed to capture something most people will not see so you get extra kudos for originality. Please forgive me if I'm wrong but I think the image is a bit dark (might be my new computer that I'm still calibrating) but I think adding a bit of brightness would breathe some life into the image.
I applaud your use of the high shutter as it is certainly necessary for this type of action and your D500 can certainly handle the necessary bump in ISO. The increased aperture added a bit of depth of field and you beanbag make a reliable tripod substitute. All in all you did a lot of things right and a fine image is the result.
Especially for shots like this I like to use the Dynamic Focus Groups to help ensure perfect focus. In my monitor the birds look to be a bit soft---that might be due to the drop but I feel more likely due to a slightly missed focus.
I like to shoot with the camera in manual, so I set the shutter and aperture and then I use auto ISO.
|
Sep 11th |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
I most certainly do not mind. That is the purpose of these groups. We all learn by seeing how others see our images and what changes can be made. I appreciate your efforts.
Thanks. |
Sep 7th |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Yes Todd. I think that makes a world of difference. |
Sep 6th |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
It was my pleasure. If I had a bigger file to work with (the original or even a full size file) the results would have been even more stunning. This is why it is said the every image coming from a digital camera really needs to be processed. Images from camera are always flat and dull compared to what they can blossom into. |
Sep 5th |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Just me again.
I had some time so I played a bit in Lightroom to breathe some "life" into your fine image.
Brushed in some highlights, darkened shadows and added some yellow or magenta to the appropriate highlights. Also added a slight GND filter to the bottom.
Hope you don't mind. |
Sep 5th |
 |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
You have a a most appealing and engaging image with this scene. The image has great balance and the powerful, winding leading line of the river draws the viewer into the scene. I especially like the fact that you have some directional light and that the light appears to be coming from around the invisible bend. This simple addition of "secret" light is what makes the image so much more than just another landscape. I applaud you fine use of light---it is what makes the photo special.
Since I love editing photos, if this were mine I would use LIghtroom's Adjustment brush and ever so slightly add a bit of brightness and yellow to the parts of the cliffs on the right where the light strikes. It would add even more drama to the scene. |
Sep 5th |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
This shot works quite nicely as a portrait even in the horizontal position since with rack he is quite wide.
You seem to have gotten the exposure right on and the image is sharp. However I have to agree with Michael and suggest that you crop off about half of the area above the moose. As it is shown, the image feels out of balance and with the suggested crop you will focus more attention on the moose.
Overall, it is a fine shot of record. |
Sep 5th |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I actually like the shallow depth of field as it makes the snake stand out more. As already noted the snake's eye is sharp and that holds the attention of the viewer.
If you processed this in Photoshop, you might consider using the blur tool and adding a bit of blur to the coil of the snake in the lower right corner. Since the rest of the snake is burred it would feel natural and bring the focus even more toward the eye and the head. |
Sep 4th |
| 67 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
You might be right. The little birds were quite dark in the image so I did try to brighten them a bit. I'm working on a new computer and do not have it calibrated as yet. But you are probably right the chicks should be darkened.
I like the view of the mother as it shows the shoulder chevrons and the white head that are the markers for a Wurdeman Heron. |
Sep 4th |
8 comments - 3 replies for Group 67
|
| 69 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Just Lovely.
You already know just how much I love this image.
It really deserved the 10, wish it could have been higher. |
Sep 7th |
| 69 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
That is funny. I sent it to all the Nature Plus groups. Thought it might help. |
Sep 3rd |
| 69 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Hi Mervyn
This is not especially about your image this month, although it could be. I found this tutorial that might be useful for the members of your Nature Plus group.
Hope it is useful.
I happen to be a fan of Matt Kloskowski. He has made a ton of videos featuring tips and tricks for editing images using Photoshop and Lightroom. Today I received a notice about a new video he just posted. It was a tip on something I have been doing for years regarding how to edit eyes in wildlife photos. I'm attaching the link for this video here. The first 4 minutes and the most important but I suggest watching the entire video.
Regards Larry
https://mattk.com/amazing-eye-technique-for-wildlife-photos-in-lightroom-and-photoshop/ |
Sep 3rd |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 69
|
| 70 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Great idea for capture. This inspires the imagination.
May I offer two suggestions. Check out an app for your phone called Photopills. With that at home or on location you can actually see exactly where polaris will appear and when. If you are going to do this type of photography you absolutely have to get that app.
Second, a little trick to getting your foreground sharp and perfect.
Once youhave framed yourshot, shoot the foreground at a much lower ISO, and light paint the important rocks. After you get the star trails just add the foreground shot on top. The beauty is you can take several shots of the foreground util you get the painting right. |
Sep 11th |
| 70 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I love the balance you have in this photo with the trees on both the right and the left. But perhaps what is even better is the use of space. The image has the feel of minimalism, something rarely done. You also included a gentle "S" curve that adds serenity to the image.
You really nailed this one. |
Sep 7th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 70
|
| 71 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Great job of getting a foreground, mid-ground and background and making them all look good and contribute to the total image. |
Sep 11th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 71
|
| 72 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
This is certainly a show stopper!! You did everything right and got the reward you deserve.
Like Issac, I would try to move that horizon out of the center. Personally, I'd crop a bit off the top. |
Sep 11th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 72
|
| 82 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
It is always about the light and in this case you have some very interesting light to work with. The misty glow and the fog add a great deal of drama to the image. Well done with this one. |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 82
|
| 89 |
Sep 20 |
Reply |
I use Lightroom. In Lightroom there is a Adjustment Brush that allows me to simply paint in Noise Reduction where ever I wish. I can also do it globally but that would not work for your bird photo because it would soften the bird as well.
It is still a nice photo. |
Sep 10th |
| 89 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
You really have a fine image and have captured the peak action. I realize the need for the high ISO in order to get the shutter speed necessary. May I suggest perhaps a selected brush to take the noise out of the background? If you work the background carefully you can smooth out the noise and it will improve the appearance. It is really easy to do with the software available. |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 89
|
| 90 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Dan has a great idea with cloning out that rock under the neck. That would give the bird some real separation.
I read you bio about not being able to carry the 400mm for long birding outings. I'm in south Florida and there area number of areas where birders and taking tripods and long lenses in a big wheel baby stroller. The big wheels make it easy to move over rough terrain and the gear rides nicely as well. Some of the photographers strap in the gear for safety.
Anyway, just a thought. |
Sep 25th |
| 90 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
The framing makes it feel that you are deep in the bayous and the light of the sunset adds a bit of magic. For being taken from a kayak,this is a really wonderful image. |
Sep 7th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 90
|
| 91 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I'm going to second Gary's thoughts. You should remove the branches in the upper left corner and lighten the tree on the right. As it is that dark tree on the right takes interest away from the real subject. |
Sep 25th |
| 91 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
I think this image is all about textures and you managed to bring out some excellent detail. I fully agree, the footprints add interest to this image. |
Sep 25th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 91
|
| 93 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Joe McNally (a National Geographic photographer) said that anytime you fully light an image it is boring, but when you partially light an image you have magic.
That is what you have here,all those shadow areas in the foreground add so much drama to the scene and are a perfect compliment to the lovely sky. |
Sep 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 93
|
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
OK you guys asked--so here it is. If you still have questions---please ask, I'll be happy to answer.
Larry
I do a lecture series on photography for camera clubs throughout Florida. The content shown here is from a program titled "Creating Tack Sharp Images".
Subject Standing, Perching, no movement:
This is the Basic. In this instance all the potential motion come from you and your handling of the camera. Under ideal conditions, if I am really careful, I can manage 1/60, so in the field I will double it to 1/125. I will go higher if possible.
Creatures in Purposeful Motion:
This is for situations where the subject is walking normally, at a steady trot (NOT running), large birds in slow flight and generally into the wind. In these situations between 1/750 and 1/1000.
There They Go. . . ((on the run):
If the subject is in flight either on the land or in the air, then I want a shutter speed between 1/1000 and 1/2000. If the subject is well known for reaching high speed then 1/3200 is necessary.
Fast Motion - Small Creatures:
Here, I'm really thinking about small birds. This is hard because you are generally closer to the subject and you will likely be panning the camera at a faster rate of speed than if the creature were to be further away. Thus I am looking for shutter speeds between 1/2000 and 1/4000.
Note: birds are twitchy creatures and even if you think they are not moving there actually is a lot of movement. They breathe, turn their heads to check surroundings, are subject to wind. The issue becomes even greater when there are multiple subjects in the frame. Therefore I will error on the side of faster shutter speeds.
How to I manage to get high shutter speeds? When shooting birds, I first set the necessary aperture to get the DOF I require. Next I set the shutter speed that I feel necessary. The I bump up the ISO to make it all work. If your exposure is on with most modern cameras shooting at ISO 1000 to 1600 is not a problem. You should note that my numbers are for full frame cameras. If you are using a crop sensor camera I would reduce the ISO to somewhere between 800 and 1000. With good light you might get 1250. I have used these setting for images and get awards in contests.
If possible mount the camera on a tripod----you will get more keepers. I know you can handhold the camera because you have very steady hands. However, my suggestion of mounting on a tripod stands. I use mine about 90% of the time.
|
Sep 9th |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Hi Thorro
I'm just dropping by from the DD Management Team to see how the new group is doing. I see you folks have things well in hand and the discussions are thriving.
Good job on getting a shot of the hunter going about his activities. You did well keeping him in focus with the tall grass. |
Sep 4th |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Hi Stanley
Just dropping by from the DD Management Team to see how the new group is doing. You all seem to have everything under control.
If I may offer a suggestion in regards to shooting birds. If you want sharp images you really need to pump up that shutter speed. I would suggest for a shot like this that your shutter speed be at least 1/1000. If you are interested in my shutter speed rules, let me know and I'll be happy to send them along. |
Sep 4th |
| 97 |
Sep 20 |
Comment |
Hi Steve
I'm just dropping by from the Management Team to see how the new group is doing. It looks like you all are eager to get started and are doing a great job.
I'm really glad you titled this as I was struggling to find your subject. I'm impressed that you captured such a fine image. |
Sep 4th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 97
|
47 comments - 16 replies Total
|
