|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 2 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
If you want more realism then either shadows or a more blue sky would be the choices. The sky is easier. Remember that blue and yellow (sort of orange here) act as complimentary colors and are easier on the eye when viewing. Most winning images in contests have blue and yellow in them. (I'm not making that up) |
Jul 5th |
| 2 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
While I agree with Martin in regards to the composition and the sharpness of what is a quite stunning image I feel your processing choice was too global in nature. The sky was a beautiful blue which is now tinted in the oranges of the rocks. Those types of tints in a sky are generally found in early morning or late evening while this photo is clearly (due to the lack of shadows) taken ore towards the middle of the day. If your artistic instincts tend to like this coloration then you are by all means correct as this is your creation. I would like to hear your thoughts to help me better understand this type of processing. Thanks. |
Jul 5th |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 2
|
| 3 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
This is really quite a beautiful scene. I'm really glad you removed the wires. Being there must be breathtaking. Your processing brings out the feeling of bitter cold partly because of the crisp nature of the snow/ice shrouded trees.
But for me all this creates a conundrum. I feel the whites dominate the scene and make it what it is---cold and breath taking. But these whites need to have something to contrast with--that would be the black rock that I like better in the original. Then I run into the green and yellow trees. Yellow is the compliment of blue (you have blue green
pines) but the yellow is muted and the compliment is lost. I don't know what to do with the trees. Muted they seem like you are hiding them. I guess what I'm doing a terrible job of doing is trying to figure out your thoughts in putting this together. I would really like to hear from you regarding your goals in capturing this. I feel there is so much in this image that I'm missing and I would like to know the thoughts of the image maker. |
Jul 5th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 3
|
| 4 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Great idea. It needs to be an upstairs corner window----like all spooky stories. |
Jul 4th |
| 4 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
After looking at this image---yep!!! the house is haunted!! You did a great job in transforming this into a spooky looking house. The hearse is a wonderful touch.
You have some seriously good Photoshop skills. |
Jul 4th |
| 4 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
The cream colored water and the wind blow clouds make this a rather interesting image. Just too bad having all those vehicles and people walking around. |
Jul 4th |
| 4 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Just one question. With all those eagles that close what the heck are you guys doing sitting in the vehicle and not shooting all those willing subjects? I am assuming that this was not NOT taken at one of those -40 degrees times. This kind of image is a great story telling moment with all the birds and the two photographers. |
Jul 3rd |
3 comments - 1 reply for Group 4
|
| 6 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
So simple, yet so powerful and interesting. Sometimes the little things just go unnoticed. You have a fine eye to see and create the possibilities for this image.. Well done. |
Jul 4th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 6
|
| 7 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
If you like the look of the new wood, by all means keep it. If you really want it out you could clone it in Photoshop. |
Jul 9th |
| 7 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I love looking at old bridges. They just make me feel nostalgic. You framed this quite nicely, it is just too bad the sky has to be nearly white. It appears there is some character in those clouds, maybe you could bring them up just a bit with the addition of contrast and texture.
Personally, i would darken the replaced boards at the top of the bridge. When they are they bright they sort of ruin the image. I'd be interested to know what you think about them? |
Jul 4th |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 7
|
| 9 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
I apologize for my sharpness comment. As you noted sometimes these images when they are so reduced do not look their best.
I do my focus stacking using LIghtroom for image adjustments and then export to Photoshop. In Photoshop I can align and stack about 40 images in just under 10 minutes. |
Jul 13th |
| 9 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Thanks for bring back some memories. I went to college in Michigan and visited this area many times.
I think you created a beautiful scene and the composition flows quite nicely. You have a perfect "painted" sky to compliment the rocks.
I feel like the overall sharpness is a little lacking so I would ask if this was taken hand held? I know my images became so much more sharp once I became a dedicated tripod user.Thus tripod use is my one suggestion to improve the image. |
Jul 13th |
| 9 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I think you created a dynamic image. Your choice of background worked well. You mention that you used a flash, did you bounce it or in some way diffuse the light? There does not seem to be any hot spots so what ever you did seems to have worked.
I feel the focus is a bit soft as there is nothing that is actually tack sharp. I do not see any camera data so it makes it hard to offer suggestions.
One thing I've been doing while under quarantine is work on focus stacking. It takes some time to get the hang of it but once you figure it out the flowers come out quite sharp and the detail is more than the eye can see. Just a thought. |
Jul 13th |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 9
|
| 10 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
The jaws of the dragon are clearly visible.
I love this composition and the job you did with the stacking. (I've been doing the same thing) The colors and clarity are quite stunning. My only suggestion would be to remove the blue in the lower right corner. It is just a distraction. |
Jul 15th |
| 10 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
How did you ever manage to come home????? I love waterfalls and there are so many interesting things to photograph in this scene I could have spent months trying to get them all.
It looks like you managed to keep pretty good detail the the whites and on a bright day like you have,that is a feat in it self. |
Jul 15th |
| 10 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
As Barabara noted this is a really interesting scene and I would have been thrilled to see it. But as it is it really ends up as a grab shot. I admit, I would have been happy to "grab" it but still... I would suggest cropping the bright spot on the left out because there is really nothing in it of interest and it just draws attention.
I've been thinking about how to capture this best and all I can come up with would be using a super wide angle---maybe a 14mm and making the bigger brighter lights in the right corner a stronger subject and then just letting the rest of the light fill the frame. The super wide angle of view would create a dramatic look, but the subject would still be problematic.
It is a really pretty scene though.
|
Jul 15th |
 |
3 comments - 0 replies for Group 10
|
| 11 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
This image only comes to life BECAUSE of the composition, lens and angle of view you chose. This only works because you, as an artist, brought it to life. I really like seeming images where the skills of the photographer make a difference. Well done. |
Jul 4th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 11
|
| 13 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
With your adjustments to the background you have created a stunning and dramatic image. The sharpness is made all the more dramatic due to the use of contrast with the background.
While this is dramatic, I think I would add a bit of space around the edges (not much, just a bit) to avoid the cramped feeling.
This is a good job of making something out of nothing. |
Jul 3rd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 13
|
| 14 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
I agree. That's why I want to go back. :-) |
Jul 5th |
| 14 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Arun
This is not much of a shot. It was taken 7 years ago when I was just learning astro photography (I'm still learning). That is why I asked to see yours. But you asked... |
Jul 5th |
 |
| 14 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
This location has long been a favorite of mine. I feel you have created one of the better composition I have seen of this tower. Please tell me you took an image of this tower at night with a star filled sky above.
I really like the leading line of the road and the strong diagonal line of the land leading to the tower coming from the left.I also like the tones you gave this image in processing. I prefer the cool tones rather than warming this up. |
Jul 2nd |
1 comment - 2 replies for Group 14
|
| 22 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Hi Marti. I read your bio and saw that you took the PSA critique course as I did. I had a truly wonderful mentor named Jennifer and I 'm just wondering if you happened to have her as well?
The first thing I am struck with is the amount of work you put in extracting that staircase. I think you did a great job with that part. I like creative people who come up with ideas like this and then have the determination to carry them out.
While I love the idea there are something that just do not fit. The light on the stairs is mismatched with the light in the clouds. I also feel that anchoring the stairs makes them seem out of place, perhaps if they were floating it would seem more natural. Finally as someone suggested a few misty clouds hovering over parts of the stairs would help to sell the story. I hope you will continue to work on this I feel it has tremendous potential. |
Jul 26th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 22
|
| 24 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Sorry, you missed the title---There are THREE Giraffes in this image. You did a great job, including the twisted tree. This simple addition adds a smile to the viewer and raises the impact of the image. I like Jim's crop suggestion, but maybe add to it by cloning out the background tree and making it a square. |
Jul 5th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 24
|
| 28 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I am a fan of van Gogh, but not of this stylistic type of photography. That said---I feel you did a fine job with this It shows creative thought and planning and lots and lots of patience.One of the better efforts I've seen of this type of work. You just might have gained a fan. :-) |
Jul 5th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 28
|
| 31 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
This image really has that "old timey" feel to it. Your post work did a lot to bring this image to life.
Since you mentioned that this no longer exists I would take the time to remove the writes and thus completely restore this building to its original look. This is pretty enough to put some time into. Just my humble opinion.
There is a great deal of strength and impact in this image. |
Jul 4th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 31
|
| 32 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Yes the ceiling works. It is needed to frame the image or the brightness will be overwhelming. The outdoors needs to be hazy and faded or those cars will become too dominate. Your title is about two cities. The eye grasps the piece of art on the wall and then will find the outside city because you told the eye to look for a city outside. If those cars are either more clear or darker, the eye will find them instead. This presents a feel of high key.
|
Jul 5th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 32
|
| 33 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I have seen this falls in perhaps hundreds of images. This is the first time I have seen it from this right hand angle good for you for skipping the standard shot and getting somethng different. |
Jul 4th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 33
|
| 34 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I love to see creative people at work. You exhibit quite an imagination in putting all this together. Best of all you did it so that it looks believable.
It makes me think of many things, including Alice in Wonderland. Just needs a white rabbit. :-) |
Jul 4th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 34
|
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for taking the time to comment. When I come upon a scene I try to figure out what draws me to it and then how to capture that feeling so my viewers will feel what I felt. I think this process helps me to create an image rather than to just capture one.
However, I have never been delusional enough to believe that all my viewers will see and feel the same as I did when I created the image. I am fine with that. It my image is good enough to make them "feel" something, to make them remember the image even after they walk away, then I have accomplished a great deal. Everyone brings their own feelings and bias when they few an image and I don't feel anyone is actually wrong.
Reading your assessment of the image was quite interesting. And as I thought about it while looking at the image I think you found a quite valid interpretation and one that I can agree with in most aspects. You also had a problem with that darn rock. I struggled with that when I made the image. I even wondered about removing it.
It has been fun this month with these discussions. I'm looking forward to next month. |
Jul 29th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Thanks for stopping by. I appreciate your thoughts but it sure sounds like we have a connection there somewhere.
|
Jul 26th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thank you George.
Getting all those items you mention to line up required many adjustments to my tripod. It was a matter or raising it little bits to change angles. I know there is the thing that since we can straighten everything that we should. For me this was the aftermath of a hurricane, things were not supposed to be straight.
Thanks for commenting. |
Jul 13th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thank you for stopping by to comment. I really appreciate your thoughts. |
Jul 10th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for your thoughts on this image. I tired of just taking snapshots and really try to create my images. I also try to push to the limits the capability of my gear. I try to think of them as tools that I can apply to do a job.
I had the same problem as you with adjusting the perspective of the posts and ended up like you with the post right on the left edge. I do agree that using the perspective adjustment often works and improves images greatly. Thanks for your efforts. |
Jul 10th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I feel the B/W version adds impact to this image and the direction light has a great deal more impact in B/W than in the color version. As others have said, their is just enough spray in the water drops to add interest.
I do see two compositional elements to which I will offer suggestions. First I would also go with the square format and eliminate the clouds on the left edge. The just seem to be distractors. Second,I wish there was a tad more space at the bottom of the image. It just feel cramped on the lower edge as compared to the top.
I do like the drama you produced. You seem to have a knack for producing images that are attention grabbers. |
Jul 9th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for commenting Arne. I hope the image was as powerful as the words. My PSA Nature Study Group really stresses the story telling part of an image and I'm trying to get this to come across in my photos. |
Jul 9th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Bill. I think one of the things I like the most is the monochrome feel. I think if helps mute the image and force more attention to the little ray of hope in the sky. Hard to believe that the pier was about 20 feet longer and had light poles on it before the storm. |
Jul 9th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
I belong to a PSA Nature Study group and one of the things they harp on is the story telling quality of an image. After hearing this mantra for nearly two years I think about it a great deal. They stress that when yu take an image you should be asking why am I taking this, and how can I make the viewer feel what I feel at the moment of capture. When you guys mention that I got my message across, that is really meaningful. Thanks. |
Jul 9th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thank you for stopping by and leaving a comment. And thanks for being part of my "fan club". I needed the smile. |
Jul 8th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Visiting the Grand Canyon is always a breathtaking experience. I feel you did well and obtaining some directional light which brings out the detail and contours on the rocks. You also did well in not trying to photograph everything and instead picked a single area and created a leading line to draw the viewer deeper into the canyon. For me the shortcoming of the image is the surreal color and saturation. I feel nature looks her best when we do not try to over manipulate her and the colors shown here plus the addition of the red filter seem a little bit much.
Good placement of the horizon. |
Jul 6th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Thanks for commenting Michael. Actually all of the post lean somewhat and a variety of different directions all depending on the camera angle. At first I was going to try to straighten and then realized that such an attempt just tilted another one. I did think about cloning the electric box on the left post but in the end didn't. I liked all the spikes sticking out of the posts. There is no more room on the left because there was a broken palm tree and just did not seem to fit the rest of the image. |
Jul 6th |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
First, would you please explain why you titled this "New Building New York City"? The title has been driving me nuts since I saw it.
The image reminds me of Carl Sandberg's description of Chicago where he refers to it as the "city of the big shoulders." The camera angle and the dominance of the blue building in the center certainly provide the feeling of height. Shooting "down the canyon" with the large dark building on both sides makes a perfect frame and adds to the feeling of the big city.
For me, there are just too many distracting elements that I feel take away from the story of the big buildings. I would crop from the right and eliminate that little blue column in the lower right corner. Likewise I would remove the gold vertical line in the lower left corner. I think I would also tone down the Walgreen's sign as it takes my eye away from the blue structure in the center that is clearly the subject.
|
Jul 2nd |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Reading your description and viewing this image brought to mind something an ancient Native American once told me. He said, "you can never step in the same river twice." Perhaps you found this bit of wisdom true when you returned to Thailand.
The bracketed HDR effect you used for this image really brings out the beauty of the buildings. The richness of the golds and reds add a great deal of impact to the image. You created a strong curved leading line using the green bushes and the walkway to bring the viewer into the frame while using the attractive power of red to give my eye a place to rest. The fact that the gold capped monuments are NOT bright white allows the eye to travel into the frame. You make Thailand look quite inviting.
For me, the bothersome part of the image is the vast amount of grey sky. Since the eye is naturally drawn to light and bright areas and rest of the image consists of muted colors the sky becomes quite dominate. It is easily 50% of the total image. Cropping won't solve this problem and I have no real idea what would other than recomposing. I'm clutching at straws here, maybe is the colors were more vibrant they would draw attention away from the sky, I don't know.
There is much to like about this image, but for me, there is that sky. Care to convince me why I'm wrong???
|
Jul 2nd |
| 36 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I think the combination of Shaker elegance, the perfectly placed bowl of lemons and the leading curved lines of the rail and stairs just make everything flow through the image. More importantly the feeling of window light adds drama. The light almost creates a "spotlight effect to briefly hold my eye in the center of the image. There is just enough light in the shadow to reveal the detail and avoid black holes and the overall effect makes this seem very real and pleasant. Blue and yellow are complimentary colors and here the stairs and the lemons create a strong bond with the viewer. In much the same way red and green are complimentary colors . together those four colors really work well in this image. The use of color and the light make this magical. I find this image to have one of the strongest impacts I have seen in quite a long time.
I think your composition is nearly flawless. Please I am really nit-picking with these suggestions and the image can stand quite well as it is. First, there are 2 bright spots on the green door on the right. I wish they were not there. Neither bothered me at first, but once I found them, I can't get them out of my head. The second is so minor, I hesitate to mention it. There is a tiny gap to the left of the lower stair in the left corner. My choice would be to move the left edge slightly to the right just to eliminate this gap. There is barely enough brick on the left edge to do this and still leave a column of brick on the edge.
By the way, I think you left just enough floor to create the perfect compliment to the brick wall and I love the manner in which the light illuminates the old wood. This is really beautiful.
|
Jul 2nd |
7 comments - 8 replies for Group 36
|
| 49 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
There is nothing to forgive. You are to be commended for getting about as much as you seem to be. I have no problem with the submission of older images. With the covid situation many people on this form are not getting out like they have in the past---and a good photo is a good photo whenever it was taken. As for these bears---you got closer to this species than I have :-)
Do what you can, take care of yourself and I'll keep looking for your next submission. |
Jul 24th |
| 49 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
When I am out and about to shoot I carry a few pinch clothespins and a few strips of velcro so that I can move flowers to angles where I can better photograph them. Sometimes even some twist ties will do the trick.
Just a few gimmicks to help get the job done. |
Jul 21st |
| 49 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Patience is certainly a virtue. I sympathize with your trials and tribulation in the art of backyard photography. I see you struggled with backgrounds as much as I did.
The water drops work well for this image, did you use water or glycerin to create them?
Also, have you tried using pieces of cardboard, colored paper or even cloths to create seamless backgrounds for your flowers? |
Jul 16th |
| 49 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
You caught me! How well I resemble this. :-) Sneaking off to the fridge in the middle of the night has been a far too regular happening in recent months. Even in the thumb nail I recognize myself. Photos that make a connection always work well. This certainly hits home.
I'll shave in the morning, but don't touch the chocolate milk and the brownies on the second shelf. :-) |
Jul 16th |
| 49 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
As someone who has judged numerous events I find it really refreshing when a photographer does something unique with composition. If I see one more arching branch frame I'll scream!!
This image with the "hole in the fence" frame brings both a smile and a sense of wonder at the same time. I can think of so many ways to interpret the many stories this brings to mind. I think this is a mark of a successful image, when the viewer can look, and walk away and still keep thinking of "the meaning" the artist has done something special.
Perhaps the more directional light found at the beginning or end of the day may have added something but I very much like this as it is. I was going to suggest maybe adding some saturation, but no, the way it is just makes NY look oldand tired. . .
Well done. |
Jul 16th |
| 49 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I feel that a great many things came together for this image. Having that castle set as the subject in this moody scene really makes it pop out. You manages a moody sky to frame the building and there are just so many leading lines that the viewer can not help but be guided by them. I think the overall tonal quality is quite exceptional.
I do have one minor suggestion. I feel like the subject, while honoring the rule of thirds is too centered with the horizon ending up in the center of the image. I have attached a crop that reduces the amount of water at the bottom of the frame and also adjusts the horizon. I wonder what you think of it? |
Jul 15th |
 |
| 49 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
You have captured an interesting interaction between the two bears and for using a 300mm lens you managed to get quite close (unless this is a severe crop?) I do not feel the image needs much in the line of improvement other than perhaps just eliminating the little reflection pool at the bottom. You really can't see much in the pool and thus it is not contributing much to the final image. Removing it would simply serve to clean up the image.
I see you just made you ball head loose to provide mobility. I use a gimbal style head with my D850 and it really allows camera movement and helps with sharpness. Just a thought. |
Jul 15th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 49
|
| 59 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
What a great photo-journalistic image. A single click tells a great story. Well done. |
Jul 4th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 59
|
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Depending on my shooting situation that day I will reprogram a button on my camera to change metering. The main set up may be matrix and the activation of the button will set up spot metering.
When shooting wildlife exclusively I will set the function buttons for single point focus or dynamic group focus. I find it is easier to use when I know it is programed into the camera. |
Jul 16th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Here in south Florida we have an abundance of Ospreys and because of the size of their nest they are easy to find.
I will often locate a nest with good visibility, check the direction of the wind as most frequently birds will land and take off going into the wind just like airplanes. Then I will select the time of day when the light is most pleasing and just wait. My camera is mounted on my tripod with gimbal head and I can track the bird right to the nest. Since the demands of raising a family require lots of food I can easily get8 to 10 opportunities over the course of 3-4 hours. Sometimes I'll bring a chair, umbrella and cool drink if the nest is not too far from the road and relax between incoming and out going flights. I'll even bring an audio book for entertainment. :-) |
Jul 16th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
I think the use of the dehaze filter changes the image quite a bit. The "feel" is different. Somehow the image seems a bit sharper. If is almost as if there are two completely different images to play with. It will come down to a matter of personal taste. |
Jul 16th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Madhu, you make me blush. |
Jul 16th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
It is impossible to see all four tiers at the same time. The river basin turns to the right just behind whee I'm standing for this shot. and the upper falls disappears from view. It is possible to sort of get part of tier 2 and their three in one frame buy not tier two looks like it doesn't belong. On this trip tier four was invisible due to a pair of fallen trees that blocked everything from view.
Due to the shadows and the light angles I noticed that a portion of the falls looked warm with another portion too on a bluish cooler look. I cannot equalize the two tones in one image unless I actually blend two separate images together. I would have to layer them in Photoshop and then reveal the parts I want to change. Since PSA doesn't allow that type of photographic surgery for displayed images in this category or in their nature competitions I just didn't bother.
Thanks for your thoughts.
|
Jul 16th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Interesting comment. Ambiance as a subject?? I'll have to think about this and find ways to try it.
I also agree about the rock hopping----that is actually how I got into position to take the shot. |
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Repeat after me: Focus Stack! :-) I started experimenting with this technique. But I'm still learning. :-) |
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
This image, taken in a very dramatic setting really brings the feel of wild Africa to the image. The winding trail leading down to the water and matched with the dust cloud adds drama to another wise very static image. Being forced into ah and holding situation with an image with this many moving parts would require a much higher shutter speed in order to obtain real sharpness. You clearly had the latitude to increase the shutter speed since your ISO was only 100. A camera such as the D850 could easily have managed an ISO of 400-500 and with this kind of light (there are so shadow areas where noise can hide) you could have pushed to even 640 or 800. All of these would allow a shutter speed of 1/800 or there about which would allow for greater sharpness. |
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Well, all the items on your wish list are exactly the issues with the photo. Like you I have found that ospreys in general are quite inconsiderate toward we photographers when they build their nest at such high elevations. The white sky issue, like you mention, would be solved with a better camera angle.
You did manage to get a pretty sharp image with the resulting softness most likely due to the high ISO and the light that has softened much of the image. The best part, as you mention, is the intensity in the eye as the osprey tries to stick the landing. You probably got all there was to get out of this image.
As I usually do, I'll suggest that you will always get sharper images with the camera on a tripod. |
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Isaac. I've always likes waterfalls and the serenity many of them show. Thanks for stopping by and for commenting. I'll keep you in mind on future hikes to the falls. |
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Adrian
I always enjoy looking at your images.
I think you have really hit the nail square on the head. Eliminating those three rocks make all the difference. I feel really silly missing that simple adjustment. I was so fixated on the light on those rocks that I missed the whole thing. Thank so much for catching this.
Feel free to critique any of my images. That is how I learn.
|
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I am going to agree with every else. This is a nice picture of the serene each at sunset. There is certainly a place for such images however for the image to soar there has to be a subject that holds the eye. While there are birds in the frame they are lost and not dominate and thus the image lacks impact. A strong subject makes the image. |
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Some of that softness is due to the 2500 ISO and the fact that the bear is black. Neither of which you could fix. Like we have said, sometimes you take what you get and are grateful. |
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Getting really sharp shots like this is most often the result of using a tripod and fast shutter speeds. Just about all my best bird shots were taken on a tripod or monopod (on the monopod, shutter speeds 1/1000 or higher
In lightroom you can recover some detail sharpness by using the Detail mode, setting the amount to 40-60, the radius to .5 and the Detail to 75-80
Sometimes adding clarity or texture after the above helps. I would add clarity and texture using the brush.
However I don't think there is much that you will recover in this image.
|
Jul 9th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
I kind f agree with you. Last month it was all about the falls and then as I began to roam around the area I found this pool. Remember I reached the pool by coming down from the falls. The sunlight on the rocks was not visible until I got down to the pool. There were rays of light hitting the rocks but they do not show in the photo (it was too bright). I thought the rays of light would be interesting. When the rays didn't materialize I decided to use the rocks as leading lines.
I agree, it is not my best waterfall image but I thought it was different. Sometimes I think it works, and some times I'm not so sure.
I'll try harder next month. :-) |
Jul 6th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
You have produced an almost painterly (impressionistic) image. The general softness created by the fog imparts an interesting mood to the image. For me the impressionistic feeling is quite powerful this added to the fact that nothing appears sharp provides that artistic feeling to the image. Being a naturalist, it is not my cup of tea but I do greatly appreciate the mood the image creates. Sometimes, unplanned things yield the best results. Sometimes a bit of motion blue just works and this is clearly one of those times. |
Jul 6th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
The Smokies are a great place for waterfalls. When this virus thing breaks up perhaps we could meet in the Smokies I'll be happy to give you lessons in waterfall photography.
Thanks for dropping by to see this image. |
Jul 5th |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Over saturated? Never! I can't believe you would over saturate!! ;-)
My immediate reaction was to remove the white at the top as this would better show off the not oversaturated sky. See my attachment. While the image shows a peaceful sunrise it lacks a strong subject to hold the attention of the viewer. The problem is there is sooooo much empty space that is bright and draws the eye. getting much lower would have the effect of compressing the amount of sea and drawing more attention to the flock of birds on the shore thus making the image more dynamic. Perhaps a polarizer would serve to cut the glare on the water as well. Since you were on a tripod anyway, adding the polarizer would have been an easy adjustment. |
Jul 3rd |
 |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
First, I wish you had added a 1-2 pixel border to the image so we could see the edges and thus know the exact size of the image.
This is a most elegant image that has a lot of eye appeal. The arched branch and the direction the bird faces creates a dynamic feel to the image. Opting to make this low key was a wise choice---it almost has the feel of monochrome. I don't know if you can recapture some detail in the burned section of the egrets back, but if so that would make this about perfect.
The image appears to be a bit soft more than likely due to being hand held at 600mm with a slightly slow shutter speed for the focal length. |
Jul 3rd |
| 67 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thank you for stopping by and commenting. It was a delightful place to sit and cool off after a hot hike. |
Jul 2nd |
7 comments - 13 replies for Group 67
|
| 69 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Nice work. The fast shutter speed froze the water droplets as well as allowing the water walk to be crystal clear. The reflection is just an added bonus.
NICELY DONE. |
Jul 3rd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 69
|
| 72 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
This is a very impressive view of the great falls and you certainly managed to show the power of the falls. Overall, I do like the composition---especially the close up foreground of the falling water as matched with the greater portion of the falls in the background.
Handling that much moving water at midday is always difficult and I feel that you have lost something in the overexposure of the great falls. That over exposure has resulted in loss of detail. Might you be able to recover so me of that detail or do you perhaps have a bracketed shot that better shows off the detail? |
Jul 6th |
| 72 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Well, it is certainly clear who won this year's Great Mango Hunt.
This is one of those cute images that just makes a viewer smile and some times that is just enough. The little thief is beginning to look like he has an expanding waistline, maybe you should provide an exercise machine to help keep him in shape. |
Jul 6th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 72
|
| 75 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
This is a personal choice, but I like the original better.
Both work to show the bird, I just prefer the first crop. |
Jul 17th |
| 75 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Oh yes, I like this this version so much better! Well done. |
Jul 17th |
| 75 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Very interesting about the lack of color. I would never have thought that it was not converted.
Just a thought. Rule can be broken. While we are all (me included) fixated on the rule of thirds there are times when a centered weighted composition still works.
I understand why you are opposed to the center weighted position and this is not meant to disagree just to offer a suggestion that may come in handy at some point in the future.
This is really a unique image. |
Jul 10th |
| 75 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Macaws make great subjects especially with all their colors. I especially like the way the branch on the left mimics the shape of the macaw. additionally you manages some soft, even light to compliment the the bird. You did a good job of eliminating the bright spots in the upper right, but perhaps a touch of cloning could have eliminated all of those spots.
For me the star of the image is the macaw that almost seems to blend into the background. One technique that might help to counteract this blend would be to use the adjustment brush in Lightroom and carefully brighten the bird and perhaps even add some vibrance to the colors. |
Jul 10th |
| 75 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I would echo Janice's thought about the use of a gradient for the sky, but I would suggest applying it as a diagonal working from the upper left corner. By making that area darker, it will force the eye toward the tree which is where you want it to go. |
Jul 10th |
| 75 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I think I will echo the thoughts of Janice. The would be a spectacular image if the subject was just a bit sharper. You have placed it quite nicely in the frame. |
Jul 10th |
| 75 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I really love this type of high key and mystical image. I took a sharp eye to locate this and make the capture. The conversion to B/W was the perfect choice.
I would like to offer a compositional suggestion for consideration. Since the subject is the bird and it is a small portion of the total frame I looked for a way to increase its dominance and to eliminate any distractions that could lessen the impact of the bird. First I cropped the dark shadow on the right edge from the image to strenghen the feel of high key. Next I cropped the dark areas from the left side for the same reason. In keeping with the minimalistic feel of the image I cropped down the top branch so that the center portion of the branch became a pointer aimed directly at the bird. By cropping much of the rocks in the lower left corner I basically turned them into a secondary pointer that coupled with the upper branch created twin pointers aimed directly at the bird.
In this way all the lines point directly to the bird and the bird has become a slightly more dominate portion of the image. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on this crop. If you prefer the wider original view, well, you are the maker and your vision is the correct one. |
Jul 10th |
 |
4 comments - 3 replies for Group 75
|
| 77 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Clearly you learned a valuable lesson about complimentary colors as shown here in your use of red and green. I like your composition using 3 flower and three radishes. I like the way the rose stems form a connection between the flowers and the radishes--subtle, but in the end quite powerful. The soft diffused light works well to set off subject and provides a completely neutral background. I also like the "hint" of directional light coming from the right.
May I suggest a slight rotation to the right? The glass bottle is tilted to the left.
Thiswould be beautiful on a wall in a summer room. |
Jul 2nd |
| 77 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
As I have been reviewing the images in this group I have become more and more impressed with the creative efforts this group using in the production of their images. This image is no exception. Your post processing efforts demonstrate a great deal of thought and your post work is impressive.
There are some flaw with the art itself. The mismatched legs and the fact that they are not grounded makes the entire image feel awkward. I think this image would carry a stronger story if the legs were on the right side of the rising sun. That way they would point toward the sun and not away. I feel this might create a stronger, tighter composition. |
Jul 2nd |
| 77 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I like the subtle tones and the soft feeling they impart to this image. Personally I agree with your centered approach to framing the flower. I think the image where you shifted the flower to the right just looks awkward. Your efforts to diffuse the light appear to be expertly carried out. The result is an image that shows off the flower without blasting it into the face of the viewer. This is clearly a much more "artistic" rendering and I feel it works quite well. You skill with lighting is clearly apparent. As I have noted in several reviews for this group far to many photographers do not make use of light in a creative manner. You certainly did. |
Jul 2nd |
| 77 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
It is really all about the light. Use of light is something that is often forgotten by photographers (but not the good ones). The rim light on the arm, the mask and the barrel rim add so much character to this image.
Yellow and blue (in this case blue/grey) are complimentary colors that add balance to the image and they work quite well in this image.
The one negative is the burned out section in the yellow area. There are two ways to look at this. First the burn out area brings the feeling of intense heat and in that case it is positive. On the other hand the burn out area creates a photographic eye sore.
I noticed Witta tried to amend this burn out problem and did a admirable job of it.
|
Jul 2nd |
| 77 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
The close up grunge presentation of this image is quite captivating. The textures, the peeling paint and the broken and missing window glass all help create a mood. The lack of sharpness in the barrel, brooms and other fixtures leaning against the wall also adds to the feeling of an age gone by.
I would suggest a few minor crops to clean up the composition. At the top, there are incomplete beams in each upper corners so I would just crop down a slight bit. I would also remove the the curtain(?) on the door on the right edge. There is so little of it visible that it doesnot add to the image. |
Jul 2nd |
| 77 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
First I was quite struck with the requirements for submission for this group. The requirements lend themselves to photographers who think about their images and do not just take snapshots. This is something I try to bring to my images and thus I am particularly drawn to this image and some of the others in this group.
After reading your comments I feel that everything you did had a positive impact on the image. I think your technique on the roof was inspired. Normally I would suggest cropping the tree on the far right but due to its size I feel it adds to the feel of the building being taken over by time. A possible suggestion would be to shoot from a lower angle. My idea is to raise the position of the flowers so they will look like they are taking over more of the building. Other than that, I think you effectively reach your goal.
A second thought just occurred to me. Old time photos are often faded. The fading removes texture from the buildings. I do not know if it would work but it crossed my mind.
I really applaud your creative thought.
After reading your thought process may I shamelessly request that you read my description explaining my thoughts on capturing my image After the Storm. I think it may fit in with the goals of this creative group |
Jul 2nd |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 77
|
| 85 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for the feedback. I understand your point of view perfectly. |
Jul 22nd |
| 85 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
The thing I do not like about this edit is that I feel there are two competing subjects. There are the tombstones---which were the original purpose of the image but there is the large red tree at the bottom. Red is such an arresting color and draws the eye to it and thus, in this case I feel, simply draws me in. That is why I cropped so much from the bottom, to reduce the red. In this second edit, I tried to desaturate the red tree at the bottom, but I'm not sure I was able to do enough. I didn't desaturate the other red trees in the center because I was hoping they would help draw the eye away from the tree at the bottom.
I may be way overboard with this, and me attempts to keep it simple. I would like to know what the maker think. After all it is her image and what she think is correct. |
Jul 22nd |
 |
| 85 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Oh, I'm so sorry. I did not realize that I didn't attach the edit when I sent this comment. Here is my first edit. I would like to know what you all think of it. Mostly to see if I went too far. |
Jul 22nd |
 |
| 85 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
You have an interesting drone shot of a lovely old cemetery.
When ever I look at an image I always try to eliminate anything that does not directly enhance my image. Since this was all about the cemetery I removed the water area on the right cleaned up the building at the top of the frame and also cropped some of the empty space on the left. Then I increased the contrast, and did some selective dodging and burning. |
Jul 10th |
1 comment - 3 replies for Group 85
|
| 89 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Looking forward to seeing your efforts. |
Jul 6th |
| 89 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Thank you very much. The mill is a very special place to photograph. Evenings have the best light. Any time of year will yield great results---just different. |
Jul 6th |
| 89 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
Gary, you did another fine job with this review. Keep it up and I'll find you a job as a photo critic. with reviews like this I could have used you on my photo jury for the contest I judged yesterday.
Margaret--Gary hit all the right points. May I suggest one additional? It you didn't do so---try shooting this on a tripod. Landscapes almost always look best when the camera is placed on a tripod. Notice nothing is razor sharp and the rocks should be. You have a bit of camera motion in this image. |
Jul 6th |
| 89 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Gary, you wrote a great review! You found all the key points that should be addressed and you did so quite well. You even asked the right question about the lens. Lastly, you are quite right---the maker is always right---it is their image. You are only offering an opinion (hopefully an educated one).
The only addition I would offer is generally it is best to shoot animals (kid included) at eye level. In this case, shooting at eye level would completely hide the background bird behind the one in the foreground.
Tage----birds look best in photos when the sun is at YOUR back. |
Jul 6th |
| 89 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
I think your composition worked quite well (almost) The leading lines are strong and you have good detail in the water. You have already identified the composition failure---the log at the top. Note that the log is bright and draws the eye away from the falls. I'd crop the log. You really don't need it for scale all the rhododendrons on the right provide the scale.
Lose the log and the photo will be a beauty-----good job |
Jul 6th |
| 89 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Hi guys.
WHen shooting landscape the parts of the exposure triangle that are the most important are ISO (for quality--keep it low), and aperture ( to get depth of field) shutter speed is the one to adjust. My general rule is set the first two parts to where you want and then fill in with the shutter speed.
My shutter speed setting is what ever will get the results I want. in sunlight I choose one fast enough ti keep grass from blowing and blurring. I would shoot this scene at about f13.
Nice job on the composition. |
Jul 6th |
2 comments - 4 replies for Group 89
|
| 92 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
You have captured a contemplative moment in an historical movement. These types of shots are always important as they speak to our history.
May I suggest a compositional change? When shooting there is a mantra that says the eye is drawn lie a magnet to the lightest and brightest portion of an image. In this case my eye is drawn to left side and the man standing on the corner.
Stevante ( the would be subject)dressed in black mostly blends into the mass of people standing behind him. My simple suggestion would be to just crop off the man on the left. A better solution would be to move yourself to the left and then shooting back toward Stevante. This would place the bullhorn in front of him making the bullhorn the lightest and brightest part of the image and thus force the eye of the viewer to look at Stevante.
Of course, as the maker of the image, you vision is what counts Thus if you prefer this contemplative image, then your visionis the correct one. |
Jul 10th |
| 92 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
This is an interesting image of the three kids hard at work. I like the surf and spray because they add to the action of the scene.
Since the eye is always drawn to the light and the bright I would suggest cropping much of the white sky from the image. This would put more focus on the kids and the action.
Based on your description I would live to see that shot looking down the beach with ALL the fishermen lined up. Being that I am a bit crazy I would probably have ventured out to the water line, timed the rolling waves and tried to get the long line of faces and poles. But then I'm crazy. |
Jul 10th |
| 92 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
You have a fine shot with focus on the eye of the performer and even have a bit a catch light in the eyes to provide life to the image. You did a good job with the leading lines of the mic and what I assume is the guitar strap.
I do agree that the background is somewhat distracting. SInce the eye is always drawn to the light and the bright portion of the image that white area behind the performers head does become a distraction. |
Jul 10th |
| 92 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
This looks like an interesting place to shoot. However it would be challenging with that bright sunlight reflecting off the white water.
For me, the trouble with shots like this that show all the backs of the participants make for a static and dull image. i would suggest moving to the left and going down river so that the surfers would be coming towards the camera. That would not only allow for greater action, but also some potential face shots.
Of course, if your intent was just to show the scene and to focus on the anticipation of something about to happen, then everything you did is perfect. You are the maker of the image and it is your vision that counts.
|
Jul 10th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 92
|
| 96 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
One of your comments has been nagging at my mind for several days so I finally decided to throw in another 2 cents worth.
You mention using a lower angle to compress the size of the pool in the center of the image. I have often used this concept to change the perspective of an image. The simple act of shooting low (for the record one of my favorite positions) I feel offers a powerful compositional pool. Thus I think you idea is an excellent one for the next time you visit this location. |
Jul 20th |
| 96 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
No worries, I'm not offended in the least. The more eyes we get on this the better and the overall discussion helps everyone.
When I stumble upon a scene such as they I try to take lots of different angles. I'll work the left and the right, the center, try to shoot from high and to shoot from low. I've painfully learned that often what looks good on location, does not look good on a computer a month later. sometimes I back off on a composition in case I later discover I could have used a more of extra space for cropping. It is all part of the game. |
Jul 18th |
| 96 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
Richard
Thanks for participating in this discussion. I think you added some pertinent points to this discussion. My answer to your comment in contained in the lengthy reply I made to Robert above. |
Jul 12th |
| 96 |
Jul 20 |
Reply |
When someone asked serious photographic questions I am happy to enter into a discussion, because that is both how we learn (both of us) and it is the real purpose of these discussion groups.
I very much understand you comment about figuring out "what is my vision" and "how I feel" about an image. I learned the importance of this from reading several Galen Rowell's both. He was considered a true photographic savant of the 20th century. Like you I knew I felt something, but what? What I first learned from Galen was to ask myself why I was drawn to a particular scene, then to identify my subject and finally to figure out how to communicate this to a viewer. I struggled (still do) majorly to do this. I have learned to just sit and taken it all in--sort of a smell the roses philosophy, until I figure it all out. Like you, and unlike Galen who did it all in camera (slide film) I have found that a image truly consists of two parts. First there is the camera work and then there is the post work. I think when we try to recreate our "feelings" that post work really matters. We are trying to create what our soul felt, and that is not always physically present when on location.
As I reviewed your comments and your image, I sensed your struggle to compose using all three falls. I think your choice of a long lens to try to compress the scene is genius. You are using your gear as tools and you understand how these tools work to bring your vision to life. This alone places you miles ahead of most would be photographers and it shows in your image. I understand the physical restraints you encountered as this often happens ( you mentioned Horsetail Falls) however you really had an enlightened moment when you stated that you were not thinking about the flow. In the end we, as photographers, are communicators. If we cannot communicate our feelings to others, we fail both ourselves, and our audience.
We were both drawn to the light (that is where a real image starts) but figuring out what that light was doing was what the image came to be about. You mentioned that you figured out that maybe less is more and maybe that would enhance the flow. I thought that as well, but did not make the crop because I wanted you to find that for yourself. Note that Richard White came to this same conclusion. We often get too close to our work and are not willing to give up on something we struggled to put into an image. In this case, the third falls. Strangely, I made the same error this month in my submission to group #67. I was so wrapped up in the way the light illuminated the foreground rocks that I struggled to include nearly all of them. Someone else (who was not as vested in the making of the image)saw my error and suggested a crop that worked and improved the flow of my image.
Your suggestion about adding or not adding the leaf brings all this to the forefront. Do we want to artificially change what drew us to the scene to continue the struggle to create what we actually felt. I agree with you, in this case the leaf would become the subject and change the feeling you originally started with.
As an introduction to your last paragraph let me quote Ansel Adams who said "a dozen images a year is a good crop." It is not about how many images we produce, it is about how many good ones are produced. The fact that you are still searching how to convey that "secret mystery" that you felt is what sets you apart. You are willing to keep looking. After reading Rowell's books it took me a long time to merely begin to put it together. You stated "So it is that emotion - secret revealed -that I am trying to communicate." You have identified your own problem: the emotion, the secret revealed and finally trying to communicate. Practice will get you there.
I will happily continue this discussion, you have made me rethink some of the things I'm doing and the look into your thought process helps me understand not only your thoughts but your image. You are trying to become a communicator and I feel you are heading in the right direction.
My second image this month is posted in group #36. I tried to explain a storm in an image. It is what I learned from Galen. If you have time take a look and see if you feel I succeeded or failed. |
Jul 12th |
| 96 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
WOW. This is a tough one.I have come back to look at this several times and in between have been mulling over your questions and the image. I'll offer my review to on two levels. First a personal one and second as a judge of a photo contest (a position I've held for several large competitions.)
In my own photography I am a chaser of light.Something I find very few others really seems to do. In my opinion, most would be photographers take pictures and do not really work with light. I was drawn to this image initially because of the unusual light. In your submission for the month the story is the light and the reflections. I am captivated by the chiaroscuro play of the light and shadow, and enjoy the and while you created drama with the burning which draws more attention to the bright portions, I am drawn to the center sections and find that the upper and the lower sections almost become a distraction and my eye struggles figuring out what I am supposed to be looking at. There is drama, sudden impact and interesting light, but while I enjoy the image, it leaves me uncomfortable. In the end,there is no single thing that I walk away remembering, other than the unusual light.
As a judge I feel the image lacks flow and a dominate subject. There seems to be too much to look at and no where to settle. While there is a strong leading and diagonal line from the upper left to the lower right the line leads me to nothing. For some reason I keep coming back to the blurred dark water in the center portion of the image. This water is framed by the light, but there is nothing in this large section to hold my interest and thus I move on.
I have offered these comments as my opinion, and I may be completely wrong. I may be missing something that you put into the image that simply does not resonate with me. I would love to discuss your vision, and try to understand this image from your point of view. It is not a bad image, it just dosn't work for me.
I look forward to your thoughts. |
Jul 9th |
| 96 |
Jul 20 |
Comment |
One of my favorite locations. You just can't beat those mountains with the horizontal snow stripes. I especially like the little blush of pink in the sky. You also did a nice job of framing the scene. |
Jul 3rd |
2 comments - 4 replies for Group 96
|
64 comments - 43 replies Total
|
