|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 1 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Your explanation makes perfect sense and now that I a enlightened, I agree. |
May 14th |
| 1 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I really like old lighthouses. This one has a unique feature with the iron fence. Set against the lead grey sky the lighthouse looks like it is ready for action. The red color is a real attention grabber.
My suggestion would be to remove by cropping the partial tree on the left side. As it is there is not enough of it and it appears as a broken branch That would center the lighthouse and make it the star of the image.. What do you think? |
May 8th |
| 1 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Such a beautiful image of this little bird. When you are able to get the blues and the yellows acting as complimentary colors it always enhances an image. The light and the background also help give the image some pop.
Might I suggest cropping this to a square format as that would allow you to remove the two twigs on the far right. Or you could clone them out. |
May 2nd |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 1
|
| 2 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I really like this image. The light is excellent and that really adds to the impact. At first glance the pose as strong sexual overtones, but then you home in on the weathered face face and all the connotations change. The result is a image that makes you think and that makes it quite powerful. Well done. |
May 2nd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 2
|
| 4 |
May 20 |
Comment |
This caught my attention on the current images page even while in thumbnail size. I just had to see it full size.
This is just one of those fun type of images that makes one smile. There are as many story lines to this as there are people who view it. That is the magic of the image.
Thanks for post a welcome change of pace image. |
May 8th |
| 4 |
May 20 |
Comment |
THIS IS BEAUTIFUL.
I really wish that the blurred white flower on the left was not there. If I had a choice I would wish the blurred greens made a complete circle.
You showed a good eye in finding this composition. |
May 5th |
| 4 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Really stunning. The colors and the sharpness really separate this image from others. The so very soft background also contributes. I think this image would simply be over the top awesome if you could so something to that bright leaf right in the center.
Love those yellow eyes. |
May 2nd |
3 comments - 0 replies for Group 4
|
| 5 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Echoing Beverly this is clever and certainly makes the viewer look. Thanks for showing Photoshop skills I do not possess. |
May 3rd |
| 5 |
May 20 |
Comment |
First, I love painted buntings.
The beautiful background, the striking colors and the sharpness really add pop. The open beak makes a great deal of difference. Otherwise it is just a bird on a stick. (boring)
But them I saw original #2 and that simply blew me away. buntings in Florida are hard to capture and this is just an outstanding capture. The "attitude" on the bird's face---a big plus!!! We are not supposed to place human attributes onto to animals--but human nature being what it is we often do this anyway. I think it is the little things that make an image separate itself from the pack. for me it is that attitude that makes this special. The simply insane sharpness---awesome!! Then you have the diagonal branch that adds power to the composition--nice. But those spread wings----just make this amazing.
The only thing that bothers me about this is the lack of space at the top. It feels like the bird is a bit crammed into the frame. What I'm about to suggest may not be legal in a Nature category---but I'll never tell--it can just be our secret. If you have a newer version of Photoshop then load this image, them make a copy on a new layer. Increase the canvas size at the top. Next make a selection of the blank area at the top extending from the left edge to the right edge, getting all the area above the tail. Then go to edit, scroll down to Content Aware SCALE. From here you can stretch the selected area and increase it by about a 1/2 inch.
If you are having trouble find a you tube video on how to use this tool, or ask me and I find one for you.
This is a wonderful image and remember, I never said a thing about using Photoshop! Have a great day and thanks for posting this!
OK---I know this is not a contest----but I'll give you the blue ribbon anyway.
|
May 2nd |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 5
|
| 7 |
May 20 |
Reply |
True the tree is on the wall, but purely from a point of view, could the tree be in front of the wall?
You and I know that it is not, but would someone else? |
May 2nd |
| 7 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Tom
You did a lot of good things with this image. Maybe you didn't dress the man in the yellow jacket but that yellow really adds to the image. May I just know too much but the minute i saw this i knew what was happening and the emotion that goes with it was quite powerful. I'll agree about adjusting that shadow under the hat.
The only thing that is slightly annoying is that upper corner on the right. I wish it was just more wall.
When all is said and done---I think this is powerful.
Plus the man is wearing a Tilly Hat---they are the best!! :-) |
May 2nd |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 7
|
| 10 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks. I'll check it out. |
May 9th |
| 10 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Would you care to share information about the course? Is it still available? |
May 9th |
| 10 |
May 20 |
Comment |
STOP THIEF!!!!!!
I have always been a sucker for this type of High Key image. You have done this in a masterly fashion. I could look at this all day. In a bright room with a view of the outdoors this should be printed large and framed. It is beautiful.
I can't even suggest how to improve on perfection. |
May 5th |
1 comment - 2 replies for Group 10
|
| 14 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I do not do a tremendous amount of B/W as my preferred genre is Nature and Wildlife
I have played with some B/W with mixed results, however I did find your workflow both logical and interesting. I will give it a try as I would like to learn the B/W process. Thanks for the ideas.
In your current image I really like the way you have used the chiaroscuro effect of the old masters to highlight the image I would really like to see the original so as to better understand where you came from and how you reached this result. I think the camera angle and the composition really add to the impact of the image.
I do have a question: On the left edge there are a few faint lines between the building and the edge of the frame. With all the drama in the image why did you not remove these from the image? Do you find them distracting. |
May 13th |
| 14 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I like the up close and personal feel. Those eyes are what make the image.
Maybe you could darken that rock in the upper left so it will not distract from the cub. |
May 2nd |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 14
|
| 15 |
May 20 |
Reply |
It really is a clever idea. If you try it again try to get the full oval of the reflected mirror (just in inner mirror). Compositionally it looks incomplete.
I would never have noticed the strap if it not not recently plagued me on a project. Just experience talking. I know it is hard to think of everything when you are trying to creat something |
May 17th |
| 15 |
May 20 |
Comment |
When I look at a photo I tend to do so as a judge. I look for the merit of the photo. There are 9 categories that I was taught to consider when evaluating an image. One of these categories is technical merit. This scores very high marks for technical merit. There is clearly a highly defined skill set that was needed to make this capture. While all 9 categories are considered when one category is utilized exceptionally well it can sway the overall score.
I think this is exceptional use of technique.
A photographer captures the world as he/she sees it. Photographers do not create the world, they record it. I think you are right to capture the moment. Let others decide the moral or ethical issues.
Well done! |
May 17th |
| 15 |
May 20 |
Comment |
This is a clever idea.
Recently I have had a need to photograph cameras, What i have found out is they almost always look better when the strap is removed before the photo is taken. For example in this image the strap block half of the face and at least to me it feel awkward. |
May 17th |
| 15 |
May 20 |
Reply |
I, for one, like this image. The sky and the colors are really dominate.
As this is, I feel the the pier begins to look like an after thought in the image. I used one of the crop modes in Lightroom that can be found by typing the letter "O" (not zero) as a guide. I felt by eliminating some of the sky from the left the image was more balanced .
Next: I also belong to a Nature2 Study Group in which we have a "professional" reviewer. One of the things he stresses is the in a scene like this the water is darker than the sky. So while I was cropping this image I used the graduated filter and dragged it up from the bottom of the from and then adjusted the exposure. It is attached below. What do yu think of the tone of the water. I think it does bring out the sky more.
|
May 17th |
 |
| 15 |
May 20 |
Reply |
You pose some really great questions. I can't wait for the answers. |
May 8th |
| 15 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I have a New Age CD by a band called Cusco that could certainly use this as a cover photo. It is far better than the one they used. I think the planet is a bit too large but for the album cover it would be perfect.
It certainly is an eye catcher. |
May 8th |
| 15 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I love the drama of this sunset. This sky is amazing.
However, I'm going to go with the crop that Jeri submitted. I feel the twin piers, while acting as leading lines and still taking some of the power away from the sunset. Te single pier puts more focus on the sunset.But that is just my humble opinion----it is your image. |
May 8th |
4 comments - 3 replies for Group 15
|
| 17 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Now this is powerful.. I find that few photographers really make use of light and in this case you got it all perfect. Not only do you have dramatic light on the formations, but you added a pair of rainbows.
You have framed this right????? |
May 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 17
|
| 19 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I really like the curve line of the sheep that leads the eye back to the building. That creates a powerful composition and was well seen.
Greens are always tough to render properly and these look a little bit intense.
My biggest suggestion is when shooting animals capturing the eye is always a big thing. These sheep would be much more powerful if one or two of them, at least, had their heads up. Sometimes if you just wait a while they will lift those heads. |
May 8th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 19
|
| 21 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In the last few years more and more apps are being designed that are able to add some form of filtration to an image and change its appearance. I see trend to be quite similar to the impressionist masters of the 19th century such as Claude Monet. One of his most well known paintings was Lilies in a Pond. While he greatly changed the appearance of the image he left enough realism in it that a viewer could still see the detail of the real bridge, and lilies.
Movements such as impressionism came about because the artists could not paint something as realistic as the new toy--the camera-- was able to capture.
Matt Kloskowski, a nationally known Lightroom instructor, stress using a light touch with adjustments so as not to overdue effects.
This image of the train contains an interesting idea. The introduction of greater pixelation certainly changes the appearance of the image similar to the Pointillism style of the 19th century made famous by Seurat in his painting Sunday Afternoon on the Isle. However in this image of the train the processing has introduced a great deal of noise in what had been shadow areas. I feel your effect can be powerful and have impact if it is not pushed over the limits.
Of course great artists Picasso pushed the limits and created a new reality and did so successfully. So who is to say. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
|
May 18th |
| 21 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Did you happen to take a photo of the set up? I would love to see how this looked.
For me the "blob" at the top makes me think of a swizzle stick that is stirring the creation. For that reason I like it. I think the bold colors and their vibrance make the image work.
Great idea. |
May 17th |
| 21 |
May 20 |
Comment |
OKAY, I'm impressed.
I appreciate you including the originals as it helps me understand.
How long does something like this take to put together? Do you have a vision of the end result before you start or is this a living thing that evolves as yu work on it? |
May 17th |
| 21 |
May 20 |
Comment |
As someone who is definitely challenged by Photoshop I know I could not create something like this. That does not mean I can't appreciate it, but I would certainly like to see the originals.
I do recognize some of the tools of Photoshop used to create this----I think,but I could appreciate it more with the originals. |
May 17th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 21
|
| 22 |
May 20 |
Comment |
The image is stunning but I am going to have to agree with Joseph. The falls are the real subject so I would crop out some sky and some of the foreground.You did a nice job with you Photoshop skills. |
May 5th |
| 22 |
May 20 |
Reply |
When you get it done, I would really love to see it. Please post ???? |
May 3rd |
| 22 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Much credit should go to your husband for his expert water swirls. :-)
When I first say the thumbnail I thought it was an ice sculpture--it is even better when I saw it was water. You did well to get the bird like result. This is a unique and interesting result.
I might suggest that by cloning out some of the extra water in front of the bird you would sell the feel of the bird even more. But is your image and your choice. Just a thought. |
May 3rd |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 22
|
| 23 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Lovely use of the early light. You made the desert look beautiful.
I like the composition but may I suggest cropping out that lonesome cactus on the far right? |
May 5th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 23
|
| 25 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Again speaking as a judge, if you have either more sky, or sky with clouds it will take attention away from the color and the camels. I feel to improve it you should have moved about 6-7 steps to the right from that angle you would have been able to capture all the faces (humans and camels, plus you would have been able to pin the entire group against the sand dune and eliminate the entire sky. You made a great choice by shooting at such a low angle. If anything, you could have gotten lower, that would make the foreground camel seem more powerful and dominate.
I still love the photo |
May 24th |
| 25 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I've served as a competition photo judge for several international contests and photos of camels on the desert generally do well. I really enjoyed seeing this.
The shadows and colors really contribute to this image.
While I like the pano format,I do wish you had left just a tiny bit more sky at the top. As it is,it just feels a bit cramped. |
May 8th |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 25
|
| 26 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I really like the composition and the way the valley leads off into forever. Nice composition.
You indicate that you increased the contrast and for me this creates a bit of an artificial look. It that the look you were going for? Not having been to Norway I don't know what it really looks like, but this just as an over done feel for me. |
May 8th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 26
|
| 27 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I love the clouds (I'm a sucker for B/W stormy skies).
While I like the composition I feel the foreground gets lost in all the grey tones. For me, if you are going to hide the foreground in the shadows then corp off more of it and just make the image about the clouds. There are a few hay bales that sort of draw my eye, but I can't see enough of them. |
May 26th |
| 27 |
May 20 |
Comment |
The composition is strong and the images presents the feel of an exhausted cat. Tough life.
I feel the by bringing some life to the eyes, especially the left eye it would improve the image. Any thoughts on this type of edit? |
May 3rd |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 27
|
| 29 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Channel lights---interesting. With or without the lights it is a well done image.
Thanks for looking at the cabin. Getting into the cove at night is really easy. You just start walking. I was able to walk in during daylight, but after getting the MW picture had to walk out in the dark. You can rife a bike, but I didn't want to try to carry the photo gear on a bike in the dark so I walked.
As for the milky way, I frequently photography the MW here in south Florida. I'll give you a quick crash course that will work. My standard go to camera settings are: I use a 24-70mm lens at 24mm. Wider angle lenses help keep the stars as pinpoints not lines. I use f2.8,15seconds (if you go longer the stars start to become lines not points. I start with an ISO around 2000 to 3200. I try to get close to 2000 but.... Some nights are actually darker than others. (moonless nights are best) If the first one doesn't come out---then raise the ISO. A big problem is ambient light. Remember you are shooting at very high ISOs so even a little bit of light gets picked up. Beware of those lights at the truck stop.
If you have other questions, feel free to ask---you can email me at treadwl@comcast.net
|
May 4th |
| 29 |
May 20 |
Comment |
The light painting adds a nice touch to the scene and is well down. I like the drama created by the shape of the tree and the "arms" reaching toward the stars.
I feel it would be stronger if the distance colored shore lights were cloned out. But that is just my opinion. It is your image and I'd be interested to know what you think. |
May 3rd |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 29
|
| 31 |
May 20 |
Comment |
While I like the composition what really makes the i mage work is the textures in the sand. The lines caused by the shadows swirling dunes and chiaroscuro appearance of the light makes this a very special image. |
May 8th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 31
|
| 32 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I feel that the image just has too much going on. The ladders with all the powerful lines draw the eye away from the human element near the bottom of the picture. Reducing the top area by at least a third would help considerably. I do wish that the people in the lower left corner did not have to suffer amputations before being included in the image.
The image appears to present a calm and restful scene. I'm fairly certain that there was minimal danger in capturing this image. Perhaps to obtain a bit of excitement you could try photographing log cabins. :-) |
May 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 32
|
| 33 |
May 20 |
Comment |
This is a very interesting scene. I feel the subject is the building far up the stream but I feel conflicted with all the empty water in the foreground. May I suggest cropping at least half of the water out. It would bring so much more attention to the building. Any thought on this approach? |
May 5th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 33
|
| 34 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I've always loved dragons so I have a natural attraction to this image. I think the smoke is a special touch.
Since I love dragons, I feel that the dragon should be a bit brighter. As it is he sort of feels lost and everything is about the man on the left. I know the title makes him the subject, but the poor dragon is left out. |
May 3rd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 34
|
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Marge.
I really am happiest when I'm out with my camera. I do have a passion for making images and hope it comes across in my work.
Thanks so much for stopping by. |
May 28th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Because PSA does not allow merged posts in some of the competitions but they will accept a double exposure.
I've got a real solid tripod and because of camera presets I only had to make two adjustments both of which I practiced may times before I even got to the cabin.
Thanks for looking. |
May 26th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Comment |
May I also offer my congratulations on your Showcase Image. |
May 19th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
I like the "personality" you have added to this image. |
May 17th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for dropping by and commenting.
Your idea of a thing grey line sounds like it just might be worthwhile.
Before I post online again I'll look in to it.
The framed copy onmy wall doesn't need the line. |
May 12th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Thanks George. Looking at the photo really brings back memories. Wish I was on that porch right now. |
May 11th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
That makes two of us.
Don't think I was really ever in danger, but in the dark, your mind sure can play tricks on you. |
May 11th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
I sent you an email and will be more than happy to answer your questions. |
May 11th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thank you for the compliment.
I dropped by your group to see your image but noticed you had not posted one as yet. I'm looking forward to seeing your work. |
May 9th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Compositionally this is a sound image. The diagonal lines of the bridge lead the eye into the image. For me the semi vertical shadow in the center of the i mage is the strongest line simply because of its angle the the way it jumps out of the image.
I would suggest adding contrast to the mountains because to me they feel flat and mostly featureless. Perhaps increasing the black point will bring out the features as well. |
May 7th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Awww Stephen. I'm crushed. I was so looking forward to photographing the pyramids together.
Lots of times nothing happens, sometimes I don't even get a picture.
Guess you will just have to get the thrills and the chills, from my stories.
Glad you liked the image. |
May 6th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I love scenes like this with miles and miles of flower covers fields. I do not get to see this sort of thing here in the SE very often so this is a special treat. I think the colors are what really make this image and I like the feeling of being able to walk into this field forever. For the scene you have I think this is excellent.
You do not state what the focal length of the lens was so I don't know if my suggestion is appropriate or not.
Scenes like this without some focal point always make me wonder what to look at. Do I just see everything??? I never know.
I have been reading about a technique that the photographer called Over Shooting. It is done with a wide angle lens and works best with a focal length of 18mm or less. It is something I've been wanting to play with, but quarantine has made it hard.
The idea is that you tilt the lens downward at a 45 degree angle or slightly more. Since a wide angle lens accentuates the foreground it would take the flowers closest to the camera and make them appear bigger while the top of the frame will show the rest of the field as it recedes into the distance. In this way your eye would pick up the individual flowers in the foreground giving them enough size that their detail shows but the image will still show the whole field.
Anyway it is just a thought, something to play with. |
May 6th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for the comments and suggestions.
Yes there was haze, mist beginning to form in the valley. By 6 a.m. there was heavy fog throughout the valley.
I did darken the path on the left. If I went any further it started to get a bit muddy. |
May 5th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
I'm really glad you liked the shadow detail. I brought a special flashlight just to hit those trees. Good to know it was appreciated.
Thanks for stopping by to look and comment. |
May 5th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thank you for stopping by. I do appreciate it. |
May 5th |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks so much. I give full credit to the bear for NOT bumping the tripod----I was so worried he would. I also credit my Gitzo tripod and my Really Right Stuff ball head. They really create a very solid support. |
May 3rd |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Comment |
To me the story is about those vertical black rocks surrounded by the white waves. There is drama galore in the center of the image. To that end I agree with Michael about cropping out some of the blank sky, it is bright and draws the eye away from the drama in the center.
I see where you had the problem of shutter speed vs. aperture. You chose the higher shutter to freeze the ways but sacrificed DOF and some sharpness to do so That Nikon D5 can handle higher ISO settings, especially with so much white in the image. I would suggest increasing the aperture to at least an f8 or f11 and raise the ISO accordingly.
I like the lines and the angles of the rocks that surround the water. The composition is effective. |
May 3rd |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I really like the way you blended the different images. This particular fall lent itself to the multiple exposures because of its layers and you did a great job of seeing this and bringing it to like. I agree with Michael in regards to bringing up the white of the falls, especially on the left side whee they sort of fade into the rocks.
I like the diagonal of the composition as it adds a feeling of depth. However, I would consider making those leaves in the lower right corner a bit darker. As bright as they are they draw my eye away from the falls. I feel that by making the falls onthe left a bit brighter and more white along with toning down those leave it would hold my attention on the falls and the patterns in the swirling waters. |
May 3rd |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I love this type of scene. I think your post work, especially the flowers and the sun beams worked out really well. I've been experimenting with the luminosity mask in Lightroom. It is supposed to be quite similar to the one in PS. What you did to the flowers is quite impressive. I may have to try the mask in PS.
It may be my monitor, but the log seems a bit too magenta especially compared to the original. |
May 3rd |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for stopping by. Sometimes I wonder about what we photographers will do to get a picture. This all seemed simple when I was sitting at home dream it up. :-) |
May 3rd |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks. I try to remember to LOOK harder for bears in the future. |
May 3rd |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
When I shoot the Milky Way with my 24-70 f2.8 lens I never drag the shutter more than 15 seconds or it lose the pin point nature of the stars. So that leaves me to play with the ISO. I did use the adjustment brush to brighten the MW and I brushed in noise reduction as well and increasing the whites.
I actually darkened the path, but I could bring it down a bit more. I had bot thought about about making the left fence darker.
Finally I not sure about the bravery---maybe some stupidity. :-) |
May 3rd |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks. I could not figure out any other way to do this. The glen with the cabin was just too dark and I needed time to light paint, thus the double exposure. |
May 3rd |
| 36 |
May 20 |
Comment |
With this type of day and those leaden Chicago skies (I know,I grew up there) converting this to B/W was a good idea as it makes the gloom all the more powerful. The fog or clouds that obscures the tops of the buildings really sells the image. When I look at the image I am conflicted. I see two fine images within this. The first is the one you present and the second would be created by making it more of a panorama format and cropping the sky downward eliminating the bird and just showing the city in the fog. Either way it is a good image.
I'm wondering what our expert B/W artist Arne will say about the B/W. As it is the B/W seems a bit grey, which matches the day and makes this look like the Chicago I knew growing up. But would it have more impact if the blacks and white had greater contrast? Not being a B/W master, I just do not know. |
May 3rd |
8 comments - 16 replies for Group 36
|
| 37 |
May 20 |
Comment |
The first thing that struck me (while looking at the thumbnail) was the "tree" created by the cracks in the log. I was drawn to the black tree trunk crowned by the golden leaves. This "creation" drew me in like a magnet. I think you have a great eye to see this and your processing really brought out the detail. I also like the way the entire cross section of the log almost looks like a leaf. So the end result is a tree within a leaf. Most unique and interesting.
One of the best images I have seen this month. |
May 13th |
| 37 |
May 20 |
Comment |
The angle from which this was captured combined with the subtle pointing arrow like shape of the flowers makes for a very powerful leading line towards the tree. I think design feature is what separates this image from so many other that are taken in this location each year.
I feel you did an excellent and most creative job of putting this landscape image together |
May 13th |
| 37 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I usually find myself to be a purist and do not like people in my nature landscapes. However in this case i find the lone human really adds to the impact of the image. The use of the blue pallet adds an extremely moody feel to the image and the sheer size of the falls (as compared to the human is stunning.
I have seen numerous images of this falls, but none better.
This is well done. |
May 13th |
3 comments - 0 replies for Group 37
|
| 38 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Did you know that the two colors that are found in the majority of award winning photographs are blue and yellow?
Maybe that is why this looks like it could be an award winner.
Your little bird sits on a beautiful background.
Since this is a General category and you are permitted to edit an image may I suggest using Photoshop's Edit>Fill>Content Aware tool and removing that dark area in the upper left corner? That would give you a perfect background---and a sure winner. :-) |
May 20th |
| 38 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Thanks for the memory---almost.
When I first saw the thumbnail for this image I did a double take. I thought I was looking at the Lion Gate from Mycennae. Decades ago I work with a team that did some digging at that site and your photo brought back such find memories. I took a shot of the Lion Gate in exactly the format as your image.
Looking at your image and the work going on really made me wonder what what happening at Ephesus now. My mental image of the ruins and what might be unearthed was quite powerful.
A good photo should have the ability to connect to those who view it and this one certainly does. You make me feel 30 years younger any with my trowel and brush in in hands. Thanks |
May 20th |
2 comments - 0 replies for Group 38
|
| 39 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I feel this is a very powerful image especially for these times. The B/W treatment adds to the feeling of the image. However I feel that adding more of the park to show how empty it is would add to the power of the image. |
May 3rd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 39
|
| 43 |
May 20 |
Reply |
The water may still need some work, but the bird looks really good. |
May 5th |
| 43 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Nice job on capturing this willet. You have created a fine composition and I especially like the sharpness of the eye---I feel this helps to see the image.
I feel the entire image a a bit on the hot side as you are losing detail in the rear end of the bird. Perhaps bringing down the exposure would add some pop to the image.
I feel the bright water created by the wave at the top if the frame is a bit of a distraction. How would you feel about using an adjustment brush to tone that down? Its brightness competes with the bird for attention.
|
May 3rd |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 43
|
| 44 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I think this a a great image. The colors and the addition of the man makes this really work. I think the HDR really made this image work by opening the shadows to save all the art work. For some reason I think the word "NOW" in the rafters adds a great deal to the image.
Just wondering, why didn't you get in the middle of the bridge make it a perfect balanced image? Just curious. |
May 26th |
| 44 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Hey! Quit messing with Mother Nature!! Just kidding. I like to gardening work very much. I agree with your comment about the diagonals.
This image really makes great use of all the vertical lines. I especially like the clouds. |
May 26th |
| 44 |
May 20 |
Comment |
No worries. The horizon looks fine to me. I just followed the lines of the lighthouse and all is fine.
You have a fine composition and the detail in the grasses is superb. I am so drawn to the grasses that I would make them even more dominate by adjusting the crop. I'm attaching an example of how I would crop the image. I cropped out some sky and a few little distractions at the bottom of the image.However, it is your image so your preference is what matters. Just something to think about. |
May 26th |
 |
| 44 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Personally I like what you did with this in regards to the HDR. So often HDR is handled harshly and ends up looking fake and that is not the case here. I really like the "feel" of the Giants Causeway curving through the image. It almost feel as if there is a road guard along the outside edge.
One of the things O do not like about HDR is that it takes away too much shadow. Rick note this with his comment about the lack of black in the cracks. I think those black just might add drama to the over all mood of the image.
Years ago I shot with a D300s and always thought it was a fine camera. Glad to see its cousin is still producing gret images. |
May 26th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 44
|
| 47 |
May 20 |
Reply |
It is your image If you like it then that is the way it belongss. |
May 23rd |
| 47 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I like the way you have given your subject a healthy glow to her skin. I bet she will really like the image. |
May 18th |
| 47 |
May 20 |
Comment |
The image youpr3sent is very moody and contrasty and for me creates an almost sinister feeling. I feel the drama is more in the sky so I did some editing shifted the drama to the sky.
Just an alternate feeling, what do your think? |
May 18th |
 |
| 47 |
May 20 |
Comment |
This a a very interesting falls with a sort of cork-screw twist to it as Jack indicates.
For me deal breakers on water falls occur when parts of the falls are over exposed ad blown out. I really like the lower portion of the falls because the water retains detail. However in the upper portion there is one large section where the highlights are blown. This is the major reason I ONLY shoot waterfalls on cloudy or rainy days.
Thanks for posting, I like the image. |
May 18th |
| 47 |
May 20 |
Comment |
After reading your write up here is my take on the image.
I like the overall composition but the color is my preference because the color shows more drama. This is because the b/w version, at for me is simply to grey. A strong B/W image should have clear sharp blacks and white.. Your conversion image feels mostly grey.
Just my 2 cents. I'd like to hear your thoughts. |
May 18th |
4 comments - 1 reply for Group 47
|
| 49 |
May 20 |
Reply |
There are a number of ways this can be done. As you said you could place something behind the plant. If the plant is really small I've used my hat, the back of my camera bag, even my camouflage raincoat for my camera. I know some macro photographers who actually bring small drapes that they set up.
Then there are camera tricks. One method is just using shallow DOF by using a smaller fstop. Of course you have to experiment. FOr example, you used f16. Did you actually need f16 to keep the plant in focus, or could you have managed with f11. The lower the fstop, the more blur you get in the background.
I have always been a background fanatic. I look at backgrounds as much as I look at subjects. I strive to get uncluttered backgrounds because then the image looks better. Often changing the camera angle will do the trick. For example, could you have shifted slightly to the left or the right and cleaned up the background. What about camera angle? Maybe shooting slightly down on the subject will change the background, or even slightly up.
You just have to learn to be aware of what is in front of the camera. I try to avoid anything bright because it will draw the eye away from the subject.
Although I was not at your location, the portion of the background to the left of the offending tree is the best part of your background. So I would have tried to move myself to the right and angle the camera a bit to the right as well as that would move the dark tree toward the right and maybe right out of the frame.
Sorry for the long explanation.
Good Luck |
May 19th |
| 49 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Since you say you are experimenting I understand the image. But I still think I would prefer that the dark and large tree trunk was not in the center of the image. I do like the arrival of new live as shown in the greens. |
May 18th |
| 49 |
May 20 |
Comment |
A very original and unusual high key image.
I generally do not like "stylistic " images but this one works out rather inteestingly. |
May 18th |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 49
|
| 53 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Now photographing you would have been a great picture!!
Sorry I missed it. :-) |
May 7th |
| 53 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I have never been a huge fan of butt shots, But seeing these big boys strolling down the road just seems to work. I think you did well shooting this at a sharp angle.
I have got to ask two questions. I think I counted at least 6 feet on the buffalo on the right---so was there a third buffalo in the group?
My second question, did you get out of the car to take this shot or is it through a window? |
May 7th |
| 53 |
May 20 |
Comment |
As an life long woodworker, this speaks to my soul. Are the shavings of your making? |
May 7th |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 53
|
| 59 |
May 20 |
Comment |
PEAK ACTION! That is what makes this a winner. The concentration and extreme angle and the fact that you did not blow out any of the bright whites make this a winner.
One of the best surfing images I've seen this year. |
May 3rd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 59
|
| 62 |
May 20 |
Comment |
When I was looking at the thumbnails your image stood out simply because it looked different. Most seem to regard monotone as another way of saying black and white but your interpretation was quite different and that made it stand out.
Another thing that I found interesting regarding your image was the extremely shallow depth of field. DOF of field is a tool that I do not feel is used as effectively by many photographers as it could be and in your case it was another reason why your image stands out.
While I greatly admire your image I would like to offer two suggestions. First the two white UFO's floating in the center of the image could easily be cloned out. The eye is immediately drawn to the lightest and brightest portion of the image and those spots certainly qualify. Removing them will force the viewer to focus on the true subject.
The second thing I would suggest, and for basically the same reason, would be to crop from the left side enough to eliminate the bright column of light on the edge. It also, being bright, attracts the eye. Would you agree with either of these suggestions? I would like to hear from you since it is your image and you created it in the manner that seemed best to you.
|
May 11th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 62
|
| 65 |
May 20 |
Reply |
It is your image and your choice. The maker is ALWAYS right.
Either way, I like the image. |
May 19th |
| 65 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Very simple but impactive. The reflections are what make the image. I wonder if you could add a bit of noise reduction to the black base. |
May 19th |
| 65 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Creative, well seen and executed. I greatly appreciate high key when it is done right. This seems right.
Well done. |
May 19th |
| 65 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Strange, very strange!
Thanks for the close up view of your world. Not sure I want to visit,but it is an interesting view.
This image certainly grabs the eye. You do not provide an fstop, wish I knew what it was. I would have liked just a tad more DOF to sharpen the face up --I think it would have made the subject a bit more interesting. But this does have drama. |
May 19th |
| 65 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Sometimes there is just no stopping a creative person with time on their hands. :-) |
May 19th |
3 comments - 2 replies for Group 65
|
| 67 |
May 20 |
Reply |
It always works out better when you have more eyes to review the image. Sometimes you just get too close to your own work and need that neutral point of view. |
May 12th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Todd
That sort of over exposure usually results when you start combining images. When you combine, one image goes for highlight and one for shadows. In this case the image that worked the shadows over exposed the highlights to make the shadows come out. That is the trade off. |
May 10th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks Richard.
The tail feathers are a tad soft, but you would have to be looking to find that out. I figure, if I did my job right your eye should be glued to the bird and the bubbles. Nothing else should matter.
I appreciate the compliment. |
May 10th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Great to see you are up to trying new ideas.
I think the fix for the branch worked out pretty well.
I also agree that making the background darker did make the bird pop out a bit more.
Perhaps now that you have taken the highlights out of the background maybe it could be brightened just a tad. not quite to the point it was but a bit lighter than it is now.
This sort of thing is all about degrees, sometimes just a little bit makes a big difference.
Great job so far. :-)
I do like the way you are experimenting and incrementally improving your images each month. You really are making progress. |
May 9th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Reply |
That reflection would have been cool if the photographer and used greater DOF and kept the reflection in better focus. The photographer just be some sort of hack. :-)
|
May 9th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Comment |
It would appear that your stalking skills are working quite well and that you are getting accustomed to your exotic surroundings. I hope the service staff is keeping you supplied with cold drinks and snacks. If it necessary to wear mosquito repellent in the evenings? Does the service staff refill the feeders as they are emptied?
It would appear that your choice of gear worked out. I also like the light striking the subject. The selection of both the feeder location and the camera setting allowed for the creation of a suitably blurred background that helps to set off the subject. I like the positioning of the birds in the frame. You also did well to have a catch light in the bird's eye.
My only suggestions may or may not be necessary--your choice, since you are the maker of the image. You have a lot of time at your disposal so why not play around.
I would try using an adjustment brush to bring down the highlights on the branch since they appear almost white. Also since the bird is so bright ( a good thing) maybe selectively bringing down the brighter areas of the background would add even more pop to the birds.
You have a really nice photo of a visitor. Good job.
|
May 6th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Michael, I think you are right. I also like this crop much better. In this version the lizard really pops out. |
May 5th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Bring on the circus ball!!
Talk about being in the right place at the right time--you certainly hit the mark. Your composition is perfect (love the vertical format) and the exposure is right on. I also note your D850 handled the dynamic range quite well.
My suggestion is due to the situation. As always, the eye to drawn like a magnet to the brightest part of the i mage and in this case it is the green tree behind and in front of the elephant. I think i would use an adjustment rush to "slightly" lighten the elephant, and then use the adjustment brush's luminosity mask to select the color of the bright green leaves and make them a bit darker. This two adjustments would have the effect of making the elephant stand out more in the final image. |
May 5th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Comment |
You may get to read some of the review twice so don't expect something new for Nature2 later this month. :-)
This is one of my favorite gateway locations. I've walked this trail many times on my way into the backcountry and some beautiful country. (Try Bluebird Lake,the campsite up on the overlook rock is well worth the walk.
The cropped section of the cascade is a inspirational choice and the composition looks quite dramatic. At first look I find it stunning. But then the naturalist in me kicks in and for me this begins to fall apart. What you have created is a "fine art" interpretation of the cascade. This is a style that is becoming more popular with the introduction of more AI technology. While the look of the water has instant appeal (remember I said it was stunning) the scene, at least for me looks fake. Nature has become too crisp, to clear and too sharp. If the viewer is into fine art I can see this on a Gallery Wall enlarged to massive size (30x40 plus). If the viewer is a naturalist, then this will feel like it has been pushed too far.
Beauty in this case in the eye of the maker and the viewer.
The one thing in the frame that is most bothersome, to me, is the blown out highlights near the top of the cascade on the left side. If you check the original, that section of the cascade is NOT blown out and holds detail making it look more natural. One of the side effects of this style of heavy processing it that the process itself frequently causes this type of treatmeant on pasts that are quite bright. |
May 5th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I feel you did a great job capturing the detail of the lizard. Additionally the pose has interest as I think the curve position make the little guy look more appealing.
As I have always been a background fanatic i am really caught up with this image. On one hand the bright purple leaves really bother me as they distract from the lizard. On the other hand I can't figure out what to do with them. They sort of act as a frame to set off the subject, but they are brighter than the subject. They really can't be toned down or they will look fake. I thought of trying a vignette to darken the edges, but that will look fake.
All this creates so much to think about that my head hurts. i think I end up concluding that this is the best composition you can get.
Well done (but I wouldn't enlarge it to a 30x40 print. :-) |
May 5th |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Comment |
The busy bee makes for an interesting subject and you have kept him sharp and clear in the image.
Background are as important to an image as the subject itself and that is true in this case. While the subject is dominate the many colored distractions around the perimeter of frame offer too many distractions. I would suggest a bit of Photoshop surgery to clean up some of these distractions.
I've attached an example. |
May 5th |
 |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks for the compliment. If you really want to see a planned out image stop by Group 36 and see my log cabin.
As I'm sure you have realized by now I'd rather get one good image than a bunch of average images. I've learned patience (it was NOT easy) but in the end it pay off.
I agree about the bubbles, the high shutter speed really paid off |
May 3rd |
| 67 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thanks so much Bob. As I noted in my write up, eye level is really important for shore birds and that really fast shutter speed reveals things the naked eye does not see. I appreciate you stopping by to look. |
May 3rd |
5 comments - 8 replies for Group 67
|
| 72 |
May 20 |
Comment |
A difficult catch done well. I think the wing position works really well in this image. I like the first image better than the one you uploaded in your reply. |
May 7th |
| 72 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I love Milky Way photos and this one is quite dramatic. The leading line of the trail works well in drawing the eye toward the snow capped mountain. Simply because the trail is so dark I would suggest cropping maybe an inch or so from the bottom you will still have a strong leading line.
I feel you did an outstanding job with the post work. T he milky way looks great.
I don't mean to nit pik but since this is such an outstanding image you might consider eliminating the bleed from from where you colored the Milky Way from the top of the mountain on the left. The Milky Way is not bright enough to tint the mountain in that fashion.
This is a spectacular image. |
May 7th |
| 72 |
May 20 |
Comment |
You have an image that speaks winter and with that impact it is a powerful image. The image looks quite nice with both the blue t int and the corrected white. Since you are the maker it is your choice--and you choice will be correct. Personally I prefer the white, because it looks more natural for the time of day it was way. However now that you have seen Isaac's make-over I am wondering if it changed your mind. Your thoughts? |
May 5th |
| 72 |
May 20 |
Comment |
This is a beautiful image that is made all the more powerful due to the exceptional background. Of course that 400mm f2.8 certainly helped, but the image is wonderfully soft and calming with all those pastels. |
May 5th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 72
|
| 82 |
May 20 |
Reply |
I read your reply and have been thinking about how to deal with the conditions and still get the shot.
What about using a wide angle lens (14-18mm) and setting the camera on the ground, perhaps even with a small something about a 1/2 inch thick to place under the front of the lens so it is slightly tilted up. As a wide angle it could e set up very close to the people which would help in the confined area you have to work with. it would provide a firm platform so the building would be perfectly sharp. You could prefocus using back button focu. Then all that would be necessary is setting it down, and taking the picture.
I like photo challenges and this idea just inspires my imagination..
Goodluck. |
May 10th |
| 82 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Prasad
I stopped by to see you image because I saw the edits you made to the woodpecker image posted in this group. I wanted you to know that you really did an outstanding job on the edits to the tree in bringing back the bark from where it was burned out in the original. That was excellent work.
Your image shows off a local most of us will never see. I saw in your comment that you wanted to include some people so I understand why they are present---it is by design. However may I suggest that you either should have waited or cloned out the man in the blue shirt in the lower left corner. The eye is drawn to a bright spot in an image, his blue shirt makes him stand out more than he should and he us thus a distraction. He actually bothers me more than the barricades.
I like a great deal about color the lights and the crowd all tell a great story.
What I feel you are doing is trying to create a"street Photography" feel to your image. This is currently a very popular genre. Since you seem to like this and mention that the city is crowded and that it is part of the fabric of the city may I suggest that you embrace it and work to add it to the image.
For example. (this is NOT meant to be critical--just creative) First set up where you can get the people in front of the camera without the barricades. Focus with a greater depth of field than what you used, maybe f13. Be certain to get the buildings absolutely sharp (your a just a bit soft) The drag the shutter even slower than you did. You will need a crowd of people to be passing in front of the camera while you capture the image. It they keep moving it will give the illusion of the busy city with lots of moving people. It can be a very effective image. I hope you give it a try--- Good Luck! |
May 9th |
| 82 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Hi Prasad
The original photo is really a great shot, but your editing here made a dramatic improvements to the original. You have some exceptional editing skills. Well done.
|
May 9th |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 82
|
| 89 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Much like Dave I do not mind the twig on the right. Birds live in a bush world and it is what it is. You did manage to get quite close to a woodpecker and captured a good close up.
I would like to offer three suggestion. First you could crop from the top and remove that bright yellow spot in the upper right corner. Secondly, the whites on the tree are a distraction and draw the eye of the viewer, using an adjustment brush to tone them down would draw more attention to the bird.
If you will share your camera model i might have a few other ideas that could be of use to you
Finally, Little birds are very twitchy. You use of a 1/125 of a second is quite a bit low. I know that using low ISO setting is preferred but the day you took this the light was quite bright. When I shoot birds I always try to get a shutter speed near 1/1000 of higher. I do not know what camera model you have but most cameras can handle ISO levels of 800. Thus by raising the ISO to 800 you could have raised the shutter speed to at least 1/400. While not ideal, that might have stopped some motion of the bird. As it is, the bird appears quite soft. |
May 29th |
| 89 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Capturing the tender interaction between mother and child is always an image that tugs on the heart strings of the viewer. The manner in which the colt reaches toward mom is magical. For me the background is nicely blurred and the horses pop clearly out of the background. I would have preferred to have a tiny bit more space at the read of the horses as they feel a bit crowded in the frame. I also feel you used a great angle by shooting at eye level of the animals. This really increases the feeling of intimacy--well done.
I think the exposure for the entire image might be brought down just a bit as on my monitor is seems a bit hot. On my monitor the original seems a bit closer to proper exposure.
|
May 29th |
| 89 |
May 20 |
Comment |
OK, you are pro level!!
First the background is beautiful and really sets a great stage. You did a great job in getting multiple birds almost completely in focus (the back wing of the rear bird is a bit soft--but I won't tell anyone) What really works well is that the eye in both birds is sharp. You might use a brush and increase saturation just a bit in the flower because compared to the background and the birds it is a bit washed out.
You certainly used flash to advantage and used it well.
This is something I am terrible at doing. I would really appreciate if you could explain how you did it. How many flashes, their position and what power settings. I would love to learn from a master.
May I suggest cropping this to a square format because the blank space on the right is distracting and draws the eye away from the birds. |
May 29th |
| 89 |
May 20 |
Comment |
This is very different from the usual "portrait" of an orchid. The setting and the lighting give this a "at home in the wild" feeling that is quite refreshing. Generally nature images suffer from using a vignette and in this case the vignette is pretty heavy handed. However it creates a feeling almost as if a beam of light was striking the plant and that adds a bit of drama to the image. The image is sharp and the colors appear to be true and not over cooked. As for the branch, with the vignette I do not feel it is too heavy but if the image existed without the vignette than I would agree with Dave. With the branch the image appears more natural and wild. I do not know how advanced your LIghtroom or Photoshop skills are but there are ways to create beams of light that could be used to highlight the flower. If you are interested I know of a short video tutorial for LIghtroom that would be easy to use. Let me know. |
May 29th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 89
|
| 93 |
May 20 |
Reply |
Thank you Paul. I'll look forward to your photo next month.
I've posted a long cabin with the Milky Way in Group36 for this month. (there is also a good story to go with it.) You might like the image.
I read your bio---if you have Lightroom questions, please feel free to ask. I'll be happy to provide the "how you do that" for you. |
May 8th |
| 93 |
May 20 |
Comment |
First, you make me glad that I have always had a rule for my camera storage. when ever I put the camera way I always reset it to my default of Auto ISO, 1/125 and f4.
Anyway, you accident, actually turned out to be interesting. The colors are a bit too vivid, but otherwise an interesting result. |
May 7th |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 93
|
| 94 |
May 20 |
Comment |
Oh, very nicely done!! You caught them at the perfect moment. This is a special treat because I seldom see dolphins images with a youngster.
You got them both wonderfully sharp. I can see why it is your favorite. Hope you framed it. I bet you are loving that d850. :-) |
May 7th |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 94
|
| 96 |
May 20 |
Comment |
This is a strong, yet moody image. The composition is well done but I strongly suggest that you clone rather than crop the pole on the right edge out of the frame. I say lone because a crop would upset the balance of the subject and the frame that work well as is.
My only problem with the scene is that is monochrome. What I'm referring to is the EVERYTHING is the same tone. The power of a B/W image is in its contrast--the range from dark to light. I feel that in this image there is nothing bright enough to hold my eye and I keep searching for a resting place.
perhaps in bringing contrast to the sky it will become more of a frame for the building and that process would make the building stand out more.
Again, the composition is great the subject is well seen but for me it just feels flat. In the end it is your image and whatever you decide is right (you made it) I would be interested in your thoughts.
I'm really glad you posted this.
Normally in an image the eye of the viewer is drawn to the lightest and brightest part of the image. |
May 12th |
| 96 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I like the image, especially the golden leaves and the mist.
I am afraid I won't help your cropping issues. I actually like the original. :-)
However, I will stop back to see what other crops are suggested. |
May 7th |
| 96 |
May 20 |
Comment |
I really like the serenity of the scene. You placed the highlight of the sun perfectly on the right fixation points and all the lives of the image point to that location (Chairs, clouds, boat) I like the suggestion of open places created by the gap between the land masses on the horizon.
If I may be bold enough to suggest to small changes.
I would crop from the top to remove that little patch of blue sky on the left. It is adding nothing. Secondly, other than the highlight of the sun everything in the image is nearly the same tone. That part is fine. But the lake and the beach have nearly the same brightness. While the lake is interesting I don't feel you need that much sand in the foreground. The sand is entirely empty and is just a large patch of sand. Perhaps some of this could be cropped off the bottom of the image. It is your choice, since it is your image. |
May 3rd |
3 comments - 0 replies for Group 96
|
86 comments - 42 replies Total
|
