|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 79 |
Mar 26 |
Reply |
I sent a copy of the original message and images today. |
Mar 20th |
| 79 |
Mar 26 |
Comment |
Judith, The image shown here is 309x250 pixels and looks soft. I went back in my Sent emails and found that the image file I sent to you was 950x768 pixels and is sharp. Apparently, something happened in the translation between the email image file and the image that appears here. Do you have any thoughts on how the size reduction could have occurred? The image was quite sharp as taken and still sharp in the reduced form required for this venue. Somehow, it was made very small in posting it here. Karl |
Mar 20th |
| 79 |
Mar 26 |
Comment |
Hi Yan, The panoramic crop is effective. More detail has been brought up from the shadows which tells a better story. I do not see any lens flare which means the lens is very high quality and well multi-coated. You have done a fine job in producing an image with both highlight and shadow detail in a very high dynamic range situation. The image has the feeling of man's constructions reaching above the natural landscape toward our nearest star. Karl |
Mar 13th |
| 79 |
Mar 26 |
Comment |
Hi Judith, A common grackle it may be, but it sure sounds like it is acting like a crow. Take Bruce Morrisey's class 'The Crow' to learn more about this bird that communicates with humans as Poe immortalized. The original is more asymmetric and I like that sort of composition better. The ironwork makes it appropriate for the Barnes Museum. Here's my alternative interpretation with lightened bird, different cropping, and a Firmani flip. Karl |
Mar 13th |
 |
3 comments - 1 reply for Group 79
|
3 comments - 1 reply Total
|